Journal article icon

Journal article

The many meanings of evidence: a comparative analysis of the forms and roles of evidence within three health policy processes in Cambodia

Abstract:
Introduction: In global health discussions, there have been widespread calls for health policy and programme implementation to be informed by the best available evidence. However, recommendations in the literature on knowledge translation are often decontextualized, with little attention to the local systems of institutions, structures, and practices which can direct the production of evidence and shape whether or how it informs health decisions. This article explores these issues in the country setting of Cambodia, where the Ministry of Health has explicitly championed the language of evidence-based approaches to policy and planning. Methods: Research for this paper combined multiple sources and material, including indepth interviews with key informants in Phnom Penh and the analysis of documentary material and publications. Data collection and analysis focused on two key domains in evidence advisory systems: domestic capacities to generate health-policy relevant evidence and institutional mechanisms to monitor, evaluate, and incorporate evidence in the policy process. Results: We identified a number of structural arrangements that may increasingly work to facilitate the supply of health-related data and information, and their use to inform policy and planning. However, other trends and features appear to be more problematic, including gaps between research and public health priorities in the country, the fragmented nature of research activities and information systems, the lack of a national policy to support and guide the production and use of evidence for health policy, and challenges to the use of evidence for inter-sectoral policy making. Conclusions: In Cambodia, as in other low- and middle-income countries, continued investments to increase the supply and quality of health data and information are needed, but greater attention should be paid to the enabling institutional environment to ensure relevance of health research products and effective knowledge management
Publication status:
Published
Peer review status:
Peer reviewed

Actions

Access Document

Files:
Publisher copy:
10.1186/s12961-017-0260-2

Authors

More by this author
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0003-0538-3859
More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0003-0829-291X
More by this author
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0003-0831-6213


Publisher:
BioMed Central
Journal:
Health Research Policy and Systems More from this journal
Volume:
15
Issue:
1
Pages:
95-95
Publication date:
2017-11-10
DOI:
EISSN:
1478-4505
ISSN:
1478-4505


Language:
English
Keywords:
Pubs id:
2421898
Local pid:
pubs:2421898
Source identifiers:
W2767983952
Deposit date:
2026-05-21
ARK identifier:
This ORA record was generated from metadata provided by an external service. It has not been edited by the ORA Team.

Terms of use


Views and Downloads






If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record

TO TOP