Pathology Reporting in Neuroendocrine Neoplasms of the Digestive System: Everything You Always Wanted to Know but Were Too Afraid to Ask

Journal article

During the 5th NIKE (Neuroendocrine tumors Innovation in Knowledge and Education) meeting, held in Naples, Italy, in May 2019, discussions centered on the understanding of pathology reports of gastroenetropancreactic neuroendocrine neoplasms. In particular, the main problem concerned the difficulty that clinicians experience in extrapolating relevant information from neuroendocrine tumor pathology reports. During the meeting, participants were asked to identify and rate issues which they have encountered, for which the input of an expert pathologist would have been appreciated. This article is a collection of the most rated questions and relative answers, focusing on three main topics: 1) morphology and classification; 2) Ki67 and grading; 3) immunohistochemistry. Patient management should be based on multidisciplinary decisions, taking into account clinical and pathology-related features with clear comprehension between all health care professionals. Indeed, pathologists require clinical details and laboratory findings when relevant, while clinicians require concise and standardized reports. In keeping with this last statement, the minimum requirements in pathology datasets are provided in this paper and should be a baseline for all neuroendocrine tumor professionals

Authors: Albertelli, M; Grillo, F; Calzo, FL; Puliani, G; Rainone, C

• Publication status: Published
• Peer review status: Peer reviewed
• Publisher: Frontiers Media
• Journal: Frontiers in Endocrinology
• Volume: 12
• Pages: 680305-680305
• Article number: 680305
• Publication date: 2021-04-23
• DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2021.680305
• EISSN: 1664-2392
• ISSN: 1664-2392
• Language: English
• Keywords: Computer science; Comprehension; Psychology; Medical education; Medicine; Health professionals; Neuroendocrine tumors; Health care; Grading (engineering); Pathology; Multidisciplinary approach