Journal article
Ultra Vires revisited
- Abstract:
- Explains the importance of Trevor Allan's arguments that theories of judicial review were too focused on conceptual aspects of constitutionality instead of on its moral foundations. Examines the debate between supporters of the competing ultra vires and common law theories of judicial review, and suggests why it was conducted under the mistaken belief that a choice must be made between the two theories. Proposes an alternative approach.
- Publication status:
- Published
- Peer review status:
- Peer reviewed
Actions
Authors
- Publisher:
- Sweet and Maxwell
- Journal:
- Public Law More from this journal
- Volume:
- 2018
- Issue:
- 1
- Pages:
- 31-43
- Publication date:
- 2018-01-01
- Acceptance date:
- 2017-10-27
- ISSN:
-
0033-3565
- Pubs id:
-
pubs:797378
- UUID:
-
uuid:291454cb-bf15-40d5-b6bd-a98c7d8c876e
- Local pid:
-
pubs:797378
- Source identifiers:
-
797378
- Deposit date:
-
2017-11-26
Terms of use
- Copyright holder:
- Sweet and Maxwell
- Copyright date:
- 2018
- Notes:
- © 2018 Sweet & Maxwell. This is the author accepted manuscript following peer review version of the article. The final version is available online from Sweet and Maxwell
If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record