Mary Wollstonecraft's political political theory

Journal article

This paper separates Wollstonecraft's critical concept of “machiavelian” power and the capacity for domination, from a neutral concept of politics as the complex processes surrounding the power to govern, from her normative account of popular sovereignty which emphasizes collective political power to ensure the discharge of natural duty by way of civil and political rights and duties. Wollstonecraft's voice as political judge—which is audible throughout her work, but particularly clearly in her book on the French Revolution—articulates the ways that political power can be abused and misused, and can also be effective. Her theory is political in several ways: she interrogates the nature of political power and its explanatory importance; she consistently articulates political judgment about matters both conventionally political and social; she offers a theoretical justification for the expansion of the scope of politics to cover relations that hitherto were thought to be outside its domain; and finally her work itself constitutes a political intervention.

Authors: Frazer, E

• Publication status: Published
• Peer review status: Peer reviewed
• Publisher: Cambridge University Press
• Journal: Review of Politics
• Volume: 82
• Issue: 1
• Pages: 25-48
• Publication date: 2019-12-20
• Acceptance date: 2019-01-22
• DOI: 10.1017/S0034670519000767
• EISSN: 1748-6858
• ISSN: 0034-6705
• Keywords: sovereignty; political theory; politics; political culture; Wollstonecraft, Mary