Journal article
Virologic response to first-line efavirenz- or nevirapine-based anti-retroviral therapy in HIV-infected African children
- Abstract:
-
Background
Poorer virologic response to nevirapine vs efavirenz-based antiretroviral therapy (ART) has been reported in adult systematic reviews and paediatric studies.
Methods
We compared drug discontinuation and viral load (VL) response in ART-naïve Ugandan/Zimbabwean children aged ≥3 years initiating ART with clinician-chosen nevirapine vs efavirenz in the ARROW trial. Predictors of suppression <80, <400 and <1000 copies/ml at 36, 48 and 144 weeks were identified using multivariable logistic regression with backwards elimination (p=0.1).
Results
445(53%) children received efavirenz and 391(47%) nevirapine. Children receiving efavirenz were older (median 8.6 years vs 7.5 nevirapine, p<0.001) and had higher CD4% (12% vs 10%, p=0.05) but similar pre-ART VL (p=0.17). The initial non-nucleoside-reverse-transcriptase-inhibitor (NNRTI) was permanently discontinued for adverse events in 7/445 (2%) children initiating efavirenz vs 9/391 (2%) initiating nevirapine (p=0.46); at switch to second-line in 17 vs 23, for tuberculosis in 0 vs 26, for pregnancy in 6 vs 0, and for other reasons in 15 vs 5. Early (36-48 week) virological suppression <80 copies/ml was superior with efavirenz, particularly in children with higher pre-ART VL (p=0.0004); longer-term suppression was superior with nevirapine in older children (p=0.05). Early suppression was poorer in the youngest and oldest children, regardless of NNRTI (p=0.02); longer-term suppression was poorer in those with higher pre-ART VL regardless of NNRTI (p=0.05). Results were broadly similar for <400 and <1000 copies/ml.
Conclusion
Short-term VL suppression favoured efavirenz, but long-term relative performance was age-dependent, with better suppression in older children with nevirapine, supporting WHO’s recommendation that nevirapine remain an alternative NNRTI.
- Publication status:
- Published
- Peer review status:
- Peer reviewed
Actions
Access Document
- Files:
-
-
(Preview, Accepted manuscript, pdf, 227.9KB, Terms of use)
-
- Publisher copy:
- 10.1097/INF.0000000000001505
Authors
- Publisher:
- Lippincott, Williams and Wilkins
- Journal:
- Journal of Pediatric Infectious Diseases More from this journal
- Volume:
- 36
- Issue:
- 6
- Pages:
- 588–594
- Publication date:
- 2017-06-01
- Acceptance date:
- 2016-09-12
- DOI:
- ISSN:
-
1305-7707
- Keywords:
- Pubs id:
-
pubs:647880
- UUID:
-
uuid:27b01aa4-7c97-4ff4-a941-ce6e05b2afb8
- Local pid:
-
pubs:647880
- Source identifiers:
-
647880
- Deposit date:
-
2016-10-04
- ARK identifier:
Terms of use
- Copyright holder:
- Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc
- Copyright date:
- 2017
- Notes:
- Copyright © 2017 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved. This is the accepted manuscript version of the article. The final version is available online from Lippincott, Williams and Wilkins at: http://10.1097/INF.0000000000001505
If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record