Journal article : Review
Benchmarking Large Language Models Using a Best Evidence Topic Report in a Patient With Early Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
- Abstract:
- Objectives: Large language models (LLMs) are generative-AI which generate text output like a human conversation. We wanted to assess the ability of LLMs to answer patient’s questions and benchmark their output using a best evidence topic (BET). Methods: We asked LLMs whether robot-assisted thoracic surgery (RATS) or video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) lobectomy had better perioperative outcomes for postoperative pain, length of hospital stay (LOS) and mortality. A BET was constructed according to a structured protocol for the same questions. An initial search yielded 324 papers, 12 represented the best evidence. Results: LLM outputs are almost instantaneous while a BET took many hours of searching a database for relevant evidence. However, current iterations and models of LLMs did not provide relevant outputs, suffered from hallucinations, and could be restricted by copyright and paywall issues. The BET, on the other hand, was tailored to the scenario by specialist human oversight and therefore more reliable and nuanced. Conclusions: There were no major differences between RATS and VATS lobectomy for T1cN0M0 NSCLC apart from shorter LOS following RATS. Current LLMs may not be entirely reliable for answering clinical questions. An LLM-BET protocol could be used as a standardized process to compare LLM outputs for different clinical scenarios, each benchmarked with a BET. It can also be used to analyse outputs of different models of current and future LLMs.
- Publication status:
- Published
- Peer review status:
- Peer reviewed
Actions
Access Document
- Files:
-
-
(Preview, Version of record, pdf, 1.2MB, Terms of use)
-
- Publisher copy:
- 10.1093/icvts/ivag038
Authors
- Publisher:
- Oxford University Press
- Journal:
- Interdisciplinary Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery More from this journal
- Volume:
- 41
- Issue:
- 2
- Article number:
- ivag038
- Publication date:
- 2026-02-06
- Acceptance date:
- 2026-01-18
- DOI:
- EISSN:
-
2753-670X
- ISSN:
-
2753-670X
- Language:
-
English
- Keywords:
- Subtype:
-
Review
- Source identifiers:
-
3787911
- Deposit date:
-
2026-02-23
- ARK identifier:
This ORA record was generated from metadata provided by an external service. It has not been edited by the ORA Team.
Terms of use
- Copyright date:
- 2026
- Licence:
- CC Attribution (CC BY)
If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record