- Abstract:
-
Diagnostic accuracy studies are, like other clinical studies, at risk of bias due to shortcomings in design and conduct, and the results of a diagnostic accuracy study may not apply to other patient groups and settings. Readers of study reports need to be informed about study design and conduct, in sufficient detail to judge the trustworthiness and applicability of the study findings. The STARD statement (Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies) was developed to improve the com...
Expand abstract - Publication status:
- Published
- Peer review status:
- Peer reviewed
- Version:
- Publisher's version
- Publisher:
- BMJ Publishing Group Publisher's website
- Journal:
- BMJ Open Journal website
- Volume:
- 6
- Issue:
- 11
- Pages:
- Article: e012799
- Publication date:
- 2016-11-01
- Acceptance date:
- 2016-08-25
- DOI:
- ISSN:
-
2044-6055
- Pubs id:
-
pubs:664968
- URN:
-
uri:25c2041c-f931-4b98-bfcf-3c22a3bd1891
- UUID:
-
uuid:25c2041c-f931-4b98-bfcf-3c22a3bd1891
- Local pid:
- pubs:664968
- Paper number:
- 11
- Keywords:
- Copyright holder:
- Cohen et al.
- Copyright date:
- 2016
- Notes:
- This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Journal article
STARD 2015 guidelines for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies: Explanation and elaboration
Actions
Authors
Bibliographic Details
Item Description
Terms of use
Metrics
Altmetrics
Dimensions
If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record