Journal article icon

Journal article

Moral enhancement and cheapened achievement: psychedelics, virtual reality and AI

Abstract:
A prominent critique of cognitive or athletic enhancement claims that certain performance-improving drugs or technologies may 'cheapen' resulting achievements. Considerably less attention has been paid to the impact of enhancement on the value of moral achievements. Would the use of moral enhancement (bio)technologies, rather than (solely) 'traditional' means of moral development like schooling and socialization, cheapen the 'achievement' of morally improving oneself? We argue that, to the extent that the 'cheapened achievement' objection succeeds in the domains of cognitive or athletic enhancement, it could plausibly also succeed in the domain of moral enhancement-but only regarding certain forms. Specifically, although the value of moral self-improvement may be diminished by some of the more speculative and impractical forms of moral enhancement proposed in the literature, this worry has less force when applied to more plausibly viable forms of moral enhancement: forms in which drugs or technologies play an adjunctive or facilitative, rather than a determinative, role in moral improvement. We illustrate this idea with three examples from recent literature: the possible use of psychedelic drugs in certain moral-learning contexts, 'Socratic Al' (a proposed Al-driven moral enhancer) and empathy enhancement through virtual reality (VR). We argue that if one assumes that these technologies work roughly as advertised (which is an open empirical question), the 'cheapened achievement' objection loses much of its bite. The takeaway lesson is that moral enhancement in its most promising and practical forms ultimately evades a leading critique of cognitive and athletic enhancement. We end by reflecting on the potential upshot of our analysis for enhancement debates more widely.
Publication status:
Published
Peer review status:
Peer reviewed

Actions

Access Document

Files:
Publisher copy:
10.1111/bioe.13374

Authors

More by this author
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0002-0117-2811
More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Division:
HUMS
Department:
Philosophy
Oxford college:
St Cross College
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0003-1691-6403
More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Division:
HUMS
Department:
Philosophy
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0001-9691-2888


More from this funder
Funder identifier:
https://ror.org/029chgv08
Grant:
AISG3-GV-2023-012


Publisher:
Wiley
Journal:
Bioethics More from this journal
Volume:
39
Issue:
3
Pages:
276-287
Place of publication:
England
Publication date:
2024-11-20
Acceptance date:
2024-10-18
DOI:
EISSN:
1467-8519
ISSN:
0269-9702
Pmid:
39564905


Language:
English
Keywords:
Pubs id:
2063883
Local pid:
pubs:2063883
Deposit date:
2025-04-08
ARK identifier:

Terms of use


Views and Downloads






If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record

TO TOP