Journal article
Submarine communication cables and belligerent rights in armed conflict
- Abstract:
- This article takes up the significant yet understudied issue of belligerent rights regarding submarine communication cables in armed conflict. The article takes up three key questions that have persistently evaded clarity. First, what actually is the law applicable to cables in wartime? Second, how is this law to be applied in practice? And third, is it fit for purpose? The article concludes that, as a matter of lex lata, no lex specialis rules have emerged specific to the protection of submarine cables in armed conflict, either in treaty or customary international law. However, this does not MEAn that belligerents are free to target submarine cables in times of armed conflict. Instead, important international law constraints are to be found in general IHL principles, the law of neutrality, and law of the sea protections that persist in times of armed conflict. Applied to the technical configurations of submarine cables as currently deployed and used, it is far from clear that these rules and principles permit the targeting of submarine cables in wartime.
- Publication status:
- Published
- Peer review status:
- Peer reviewed
Actions
Access Document
- Files:
-
-
(Preview, Version of record, pdf, 549.2KB, Terms of use)
-
- Publisher copy:
- 10.1163/22116001-03801018
Authors
- Publisher:
- Brill
- Journal:
- Ocean Yearbook Online More from this journal
- Volume:
- 38
- Issue:
- 1
- Pages:
- 459-503
- Publication date:
- 2024-06-18
- Acceptance date:
- 2023-04-24
- DOI:
- EISSN:
-
2211-6001
- ISSN:
-
0191-8575
- Language:
-
English
- Keywords:
- Pubs id:
-
1507045
- Local pid:
-
pubs:1507045
- Deposit date:
-
2024-08-19
Terms of use
- Copyright holder:
- Sophie Ryan
- Copyright date:
- 2024
- Rights statement:
- © Sophie Ryan, 2024. This is an open access chapter distributed under the terms of the CC BY 4.0 license.
- Licence:
- CC Attribution (CC BY)
If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record