Journal article icon

Journal article : Comment

Clinical perspectives of new insights and tools to minimize the hypoglycaemia burden connected with type 2 diabetes pharmacotherapy

Abstract:
Current state of affairs: The potential for hypoglycaemia is a 100-year-long challenge that can complicate blood glucose lowering therapy in people with type 2 diabetes. This omnipresent imminent risk continues to the present day, particularly with insulin or sulfonylurea treatment. Specific objective: This clinical perspective seeks to synthesize new insights and tools to help reduce the hypoglycaemic burden related to type 2 diabetes pharmacotherapy by suggesting a synergistic triad approach: Guidance using an innovative approach based on comprehensive network analyses evaluating differential risk of diabetes medications for severe hypoglycaemic events (SHEs) observed in randomized controlled trials. These show an estimated background risk of 60 SHEs per 1000 patients over five years in the trial control populations allocated to standard treatments. Adopting this approach, the data indicate that the highest risk (~ fivefold higher) relates to therapy with sulfonylureas or with basal-bolus insulin regimens, whereas novel therapies with sodium-glucose transport protein 2 inhibitors (SGLT2is) or glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP1-RAs) have minimal risk of SHEs, with the non-steroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist finerenone showing a potential risk reduction.Recognition of these insights and translating them into treatment guidance should underpin the approach to minimizing the risk of hypoglycaemia, as they likely reflect drug related hypoglycaemia risk more broadly across all degrees of hypoglycaemia. Following this approach would be particularly helpful in those either with specific risk factors for hypoglycaemia (Fig. 1) or with the recently established frail phenotype at dual risk of SHEs and cardiovascular (CV) events in the context of multiple co-morbidities including heart failure, frailty or cancer and a high Charlson Co-Morbidity Index. Also the acute CV risk related to arrhythmias and mortality must not be ignored. Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) for people with type 2 diabetes is advisable given it has been shown convincingly to provide a powerful new tool in those at dual risk of hypoglycaemia and CV events by reducing related hospitalization emergencies by ~ 50%. Conclusion: Each of these new insights and tools comprise an important step forward in their own right. Used together in a synergistic manner they, for the first time in over one hundred years, appear to provide the capacity to mitigate the threats of hypoglycaemia related to type 2 diabetes pharmacotherapy.
Publication status:
Published

Actions

Access Document

Files:
Publisher copy:
10.1186/s12933-025-02959-3

Authors

More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Division:
MSD
Department:
Radcliffe Department of Medicine
Sub department:
RDM-Strategic
Role:
Author


Publisher:
BioMed Central
Journal:
Cardiovascular Diabetology More from this journal
Volume:
24
Issue:
1
Article number:
441
Publication date:
2025-11-21
Acceptance date:
2025-09-25
DOI:
EISSN:
1475-2840
ISSN:
1475-2840


Language:
English
Keywords:
Subtype:
Comment
Pubs id:
2343386
UUID:
uuid_22c6a4c9-c471-4a85-98af-72ceba48695b
Local pid:
pubs:2343386
Source identifiers:
3496439
Deposit date:
2025-11-21
ARK identifier:
This ORA record was generated from metadata provided by an external service. It has not been edited by the ORA Team.

Terms of use


Views and Downloads






If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record

TO TOP