Journal article icon

Journal article

Biased belief updating and suboptimal choice in foraging decisions

Abstract:
Deciding which options to engage, and which to forego, requires developing accurate beliefs about the overall distribution of prospects. Here we adapt a classic prey selection task from foraging theory to examine how individuals keep track of an environment's reward rate and adjust choices in response to its fluctuations. Preference shifts were most pronounced when the environment improved compared to when it deteriorated. This is best explained by a trial-by-trial learning model in which participants estimate the reward rate with upward vs. downward changes controlled by separate learning rates. A failure to adjust expectations sufficiently when an environment becomes worse leads to suboptimal choices: options that are valuable given the environmental conditions are rejected in the false expectation that better options will materialize. These findings offer a previously unappreciated parallel in the serial choice setting of observations of asymmetric updating and resulting biased (often overoptimistic) estimates in other domains.
Publication status:
Published
Peer review status:
Peer reviewed

Actions


Access Document


Files:
Publisher copy:
10.1038/s41467-020-16964-5

Authors


More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Division:
MSD
Sub department:
Experimental Psychology
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0003-1440-472X
More by this author
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0001-5029-1430


Publisher:
Springer Nature
Journal:
Nature Communications More from this journal
Volume:
11
Issue:
1
Article number:
3417
Publication date:
2020-07-09
Acceptance date:
2020-05-27
DOI:
EISSN:
2041-1723
Pmid:
32647271


Language:
English
Keywords:
Pubs id:
1119669
Local pid:
pubs:1119669
Deposit date:
2021-01-14

Terms of use



Views and Downloads






If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record

TO TOP