Journal article icon

Journal article : Review

Functional methods for evaluating the efficacy of retinal optogenetic therapy for vision restoration

Abstract:
Optogenetic therapy is a promising strategy for vision restoration. Functional assays have an important role in assessing the modulation of neural activity in response to light stimulation. Each functional assay needs to be carefully considered and evaluated for the preclinical development of optogenetic approaches to work toward meaningful vision restoration. Each strategy contributes to understanding the efficacy of vision restoration and the physiology of retinal optogenetic therapy. At a molecular level, bioluminescence resonance energy-transfer based and G protein coupling assays can be used. Calcium imaging provides measurements with useful spatial and temporal resolution using fluorescent calcium indicators at the cellular level. Electrophysiological tests can include ex vivo recordings by patch-clamping at single-cell resolution, multielectrode array recordings at the network level, and in vivo recordings at the lateral geniculate nucleus and cortical levels. Behavioural tests such as light avoidance, optomotor response and visual discrimination assess functional restoration in vivo. In this review, each functional assay is discussed in the context of retinal optogenetic therapy with notable examples that have demonstrated vision restoration. The advantages, disadvantages, and limitations of each assay are critically compared to highlight their relative scientific value and applicability across different stages of development. This provides insight into how these methods can be integrated within a translational framework, from molecular validation to behavioural outcomes, to better inform the design of preclinical studies. As clinical trials in optogenetic therapy continue to expand, improved alignment between preclinical functional assays and clinically meaningful endpoints will be essential to maximise translational success.
Publication status:
Published
Peer review status:
Peer reviewed

Actions

Access Document

Files:
Publisher copy:
10.3389/fnins.2026.1812539

Authors

More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Role:
Author
More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Role:
Author
More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Role:
Author
More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Role:
Author
More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Role:
Author


Publisher:
Frontiers Media
Journal:
Frontiers in Neuroscience More from this journal
Volume:
20
Article number:
1812539
Publication date:
2026-04-23
Acceptance date:
2026-04-10
DOI:
EISSN:
1662-453X
ISSN:
1662-4548


Language:
English
Keywords:
Subtype:
Review
Source identifiers:
4021973
Deposit date:
2026-05-07
ARK identifier:
This ORA record was generated from metadata provided by an external service. It has not been edited by the ORA Team.

Terms of use


Views and Downloads






If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record

TO TOP