Journal article icon

Journal article

Optimal gestational weight gain and pregnancy outcomes, by BMI and height, in a marginalised population of women with short stature living along the Thailand-Myanmar border: A retrospective cohort, 2004–2023

Abstract:
Background: Existing gestational weight gain (GWG) standards may not be applicable to women of short stature and those who have limited access to healthcare and are vulnerable to compromised nutrition during pregnancy. To inform the development of population-specific recommendations, this study investigated optimal GWG, by height and Body Mass Index (BMI), in a minority migrant and refugee population living along the Thailand-Myanmar border. Methods: Records of all women attending antenatal care in the first trimester at the Shoklo-Malaria Research Unit between 2004 and 2023 were retrospectively examined. GWG of 17,194 women was assessed against maternal, delivery and neonatal outcomes, by height and per Asia-Pacific BMI category. The Gestation Related Optimal Weight centiles were used to classify small, appropriate and large for gestational age neonates. Multivariable logistic regression analysis, including natural cubic splines, was used to assess the relationships between GWG and outcomes of interest. Optimal GWG per BMI group was defined as the GWG associated with the lowest composite risk for adverse outcomes. The optimal range included GWG values that did not exceed a 5% increase from the corresponding minimum composite risk. Results: Optimal GWG in women shorter than 153 cm was lower per BMI group than the National Academy of Medicine and Intergrowth-21 recommendations: underweight 12.1 kg (10.0–14.5), normal 10.4 kg (8.0–12.9), overweight/obese 5.3 kg (3.1–8.5); but comparable for women 153 cm or more: underweight 13.1 kg (11.0–15.1), normal 12.3 kg (9.7–15.3), overweight/obese 9.5 kg (6.4–13.4). Conclusion: Optimal GWG ranges are lower for this population with short stature compared to existing international guidelines. Clinical and contextual factors must be considered when implementing GWG recommendations for this, and other marginalized and short-stature populations.
Publication status:
Published
Peer review status:
Peer reviewed

Actions


Access Document


Publisher copy:
10.1371/journal.pone.0330256

Authors


More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0009-0005-7049-9163
More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0003-1621-3257
More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Role:
Author


More from this funder
Funder identifier:
https://ror.org/029chgv08


Publisher:
Public Library of Science
Journal:
PLoS ONE More from this journal
Volume:
20
Issue:
10
Article number:
e0330256
Publication date:
2025-10-03
Acceptance date:
2025-07-28
DOI:
EISSN:
1932-6203
ISSN:
1932-6203


Language:
English
Source identifiers:
3340780
Deposit date:
2025-10-03
This ORA record was generated from metadata provided by an external service. It has not been edited by the ORA Team.

Terms of use



Views and Downloads






If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record

TO TOP