Journal article

The United Nations Working Group on Arbitrary Detention decision on Assange: ‘ridiculous’ or ‘justifiable’?

Abstract:: The United Nations Working Group on Arbitrary Detention Assange decision has been met with general ridicule from British officials, legal academics and the press. This piece seeks to bring some balance to the coverage on this decision, which consistently fails to outline the arguments which persuaded the Working Group

Publication status:: Published

Peer review status:: Not peer reviewed

Actions

Email

Email this record

Send the bibliographic details of this record to your email address.

Your Email
Please enter the email address that the record information will be sent to.

-
Your message (optional)
Please add any additional information to be included within the email.
Cite

Cite this record

APA Style

Lazarus, L. (2016). The United Nations Working Group on Arbitrary Detention decision on Assange: ‘ridiculous’ or ‘justifiable’? EJIL: Talk!

MLA Style

Lazarus, L. “The United Nations Working Group on Arbitrary Detention Decision on Assange: ‘Ridiculous’ or ‘Justifiable’?” EJIL: Talk!, European Journal of International Law, 2016.

Chicago Style

Lazarus, L. 2016. “The United Nations Working Group on Arbitrary Detention Decision on Assange: ‘Ridiculous’ or ‘Justifiable’?” EJIL: Talk!
Share
Print

Access Document

Files:: Liora Lazarus, The United Nations Working Group on Arbitrary D...

(Preview, Accepted manuscript, pdf, 86.7KB, Terms of use)

Authors

+ Lazarus, L More by this author

Institution:: University of Oxford
Division:: SSD
Department:: Law
Sub department:: Law Faculty
Role:: Author

Publisher:: European Journal of International Law
Journal:: EJIL: Talk! More from this journal
Publication date:: 2016-02-01
Acceptance date:: 2016-02-07

Keywords:: Julian Assange

Arbitrary Detention

United Nations Working Group on Arbitrary Detention
Pubs id:: pubs:613743
UUID:: uuid:1ec606d9-dd01-4087-bc92-961fb4c7fd3c
Local pid:: pubs:613743
Source identifiers:: 613743
Deposit date:: 2016-04-05

Terms of use

Copyright date:: 2016

Licence:: Terms and Conditions of Use for Oxford University Research Archive

Views and Downloads

About views and downloads

If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record

TO TOP