Journal article icon

Journal article

Quality and Consistency of Outcome Reporting in Clinical Trials of Immunosuppression in Renal Transplantation

Abstract:

Interpretation, comparison and combination of results of clinical trials is reliant on accurate and complete reporting of outcomes. This study aims to assess the quality and variability in outcome reporting in immunosuppression trials following renal transplantation. All randomised controlled trials comparing immunosuppressive interventions in renal transplant recipients published over a 5-year period were included. Outcomes reported in these studies were extracted, along with data regarding ...

Expand abstract
Publication status:
Published
Peer review status:
Peer reviewed

Actions


Access Document


Files:
Publisher copy:
10.1111/ctr.12837

Authors


More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Division:
MSD
Department:
Surgical Sciences
Role:
Author
More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Division:
MSD
Department:
Surgical Sciences
Role:
Author
Publisher:
Wiley
Journal:
Clinical Transplantation More from this journal
Volume:
30
Issue:
11
Pages:
1440–1448
Publication date:
2016-09-01
Acceptance date:
2016-08-25
DOI:
EISSN:
1399-0012
ISSN:
0902-0063
Pmid:
27582408
Language:
English
Keywords:
Pubs id:
pubs:641707
UUID:
uuid:1d15d923-a97c-47bd-9b5f-0d89ee87472f
Local pid:
pubs:641707
Source identifiers:
641707
Deposit date:
2016-09-12

Terms of use


Views and Downloads






If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record

TO TOP