Journal article
Omnipotence and necessary moral perfection are compatible: a reply to Morriston
- Abstract:
- In this paper, which is a reply to Wes Morriston's 'Omnipotence and necessary moral perfection: are they compatible?', I argue that, contrary to what Morriston suggests, a classical theist need not admit that omnipotence and necessary moral perfection are incompatible. Indeed, I shall argue that a classical theist can show that an omnipotent being is of necessity morally perfect.
- Publication status:
- Published
- Peer review status:
- Peer reviewed
Actions
Access Document
- Files:
-
-
(Preview, Version of record, pdf, 181.3KB, Terms of use)
-
- Publisher copy:
- 10.1017/S0034412502006017
Authors
- Publisher:
- Cambridge University Press
- Journal:
- Religious Studies More from this journal
- Volume:
- 38
- Issue:
- 2
- Pages:
- 215-223
- Publication date:
- 2002-06-01
- Edition:
- Publisher's version
- DOI:
- EISSN:
-
1469-901X
- ISSN:
-
0034-4125
- Language:
-
English
- Keywords:
- Subjects:
- UUID:
-
uuid:1cf0165d-4188-42ec-a766-1a65fad2ceac
- Local pid:
-
ora:1500
- Deposit date:
-
2008-03-14
Terms of use
- Copyright holder:
- Cambridge University Press
- Copyright date:
- 2002
- Notes:
- Citation: Mawson, T. J. (2002). 'Omnipotence and necessary moral perfection are compatible: a reply to Morriston', Religious Studies, 38(2), 215-223. [Available at http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayJournal?jid=RES].
If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record