Journal article
How might interoceptive accuracy training work?
- Abstract:
- With growing interest in interoceptive training to enhance the perception of internal bodily signals, there is a need to consider the mechanisms by which training may improve performance on tests of interoceptive accuracy (i.e., tests designed to measure how well signals from the body can be perceived). In this brief paper we use the example of cardiac interoceptive accuracy training to outline several possible mechanisms by which such training may result in improvement on tests of cardiac interoceptive accuracy. We show that under many of these mechanisms, evidence of improvement on tasks that claim to measure cardiac interoceptive accuracy does not reflect improvement in the perception of cardiac signals. We provide several recommendations to mitigate the potential influence of factors unrelated to interoceptive accuracy, enabling it to be determined that an improvement in interoceptive accuracy has occurred following training.
- Publication status:
- Published
- Peer review status:
- Peer reviewed
Actions
Access Document
- Files:
-
-
(Preview, Accepted manuscript, pdf, 262.7KB, Terms of use)
-
- Publisher copy:
- 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2025.106126
Authors
- Publisher:
- Elsevier
- Journal:
- Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews More from this journal
- Volume:
- 172
- Article number:
- 106126
- Publication date:
- 2025-03-25
- Acceptance date:
- 2025-03-24
- DOI:
- EISSN:
-
1873-7528
- ISSN:
-
0149-7634
- Language:
-
English
- Keywords:
- Pubs id:
-
2098469
- Local pid:
-
pubs:2098469
- Deposit date:
-
2025-03-25
- ARK identifier:
Terms of use
- Copyright holder:
- Elsevier Ltd
- Copyright date:
- 2025
- Rights statement:
- © 2025 Elsevier Ltd. All rights are reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies.
- Notes:
-
This is the accepted manuscript version of the article. The final version is available online from Elsevier at https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2025.106126
The author accepted manuscript (AAM) of this paper has been made available under the University of Oxford's Open Access Publications Policy, and a CC BY public copyright licence has been applied.
- Licence:
- CC Attribution (CC BY)
If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record