Journal article
Computer simulation models of pre-diabetes populations: a systematic review protocol
- Abstract:
- Diabetes is a major public health problem and prediabetes (intermediate hyperglycaemia) is associated with a high risk of developing diabetes. With evidence supporting the use of preventive interventions for prediabetes populations and the discovery of novel biomarkers stratifying the risk of progression, there is a need to evaluate their cost-effectiveness across jurisdictions. In diabetes and prediabetes, it is relevant to inform cost-effectiveness analysis using decision models due to their ability to forecast long-term health outcomes and costs beyond the time frame of clinical trials. To support good implementation and reimbursement decisions of interventions in these populations, models should be clinically credible, based on best available evidence, reproducible and validated against clinical data. Our aim is to identify recent studies on computer simulation models and model-based economic evaluations of populations of individuals with prediabetes, qualify them and discuss the knowledge gaps, challenges and opportunities that need to be addressed for future evaluations.A systematic review will be conducted in MEDLINE, Embase, EconLit and National Health Service Economic Evaluation Database. We will extract peer-reviewed studies published between 2000 and 2016 that describe computer simulation models of the natural history of individuals with prediabetes and/or decision models to evaluate the impact of interventions, risk stratification and/or screening on these populations. Two reviewers will independently assess each study for inclusion. Data will be extracted using a predefined pro forma developed using best practice. Study quality will be assessed using a modelling checklist. A narrative synthesis of all studies will be presented, focussing on model structure, quality of models and input data, and validation status.This systematic review is exempt from ethics approval because the work is carried out on published documents. The findings of the review will be disseminated in a related peer-reviewed journal and presented at conferences.CRD42016047228.
- Publication status:
- Published
- Peer review status:
- Peer reviewed
Actions
Access Document
- Files:
-
-
(Preview, Version of record, pdf, 298.3KB, Terms of use)
-
- Publisher copy:
- 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014954
Authors
- Publisher:
- BMJ Publishing Group
- Journal:
- BMJ Open More from this journal
- Volume:
- 7
- Issue:
- 10
- Pages:
- 1-5
- Publication date:
- 2017-10-05
- Acceptance date:
- 2017-05-09
- DOI:
- ISSN:
-
2044-6055
- Pmid:
-
28982807
- Language:
-
English
- Keywords:
- Pubs id:
-
pubs:737184
- UUID:
-
uuid:1b0d7dac-e406-4338-8b2e-3b9551adb944
- Local pid:
-
pubs:737184
- Source identifiers:
-
737184
- Deposit date:
-
2017-10-31
Terms of use
- Copyright holder:
- © Leal, et al 2017 All rights reserved
- Copyright date:
- 2017
- Notes:
- This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record