Journal article icon

Journal article

A comparison of the quick sequential (sepsis-related) organ failure assessment score and the national early warning score in non-ICU patients with/without infection

Abstract:
Objectives: The Sepsis-3 task force recommended the quick Sequential (Sepsis-Related) Organ Failure Assessment score for identifying patients with suspected infection who are at greater risk of poor outcomes, but many hospitals already use the National Early Warning Score to identify high-risk patients, irrespective of diagnosis. We sought to compare the performance of quick Sequential (Sepsis-Related) Organ Failure Assessment and National Early Warning Score in hospitalized, non-ICU patients with and without an infection.

Design: Retrospective cohort study.

Setting: Large U.K. General Hospital.

Patients: Adults hospitalized between January 1, 2010, and February 1, 2016.

Interventions: None.

Measurements and Main Results: We applied the quick Sequential (Sepsis-Related) Organ Failure Assessment score and National Early Warning Score to 5,435,344 vital signs sets (241,996 hospital admissions). Patients were categorized as having no infection, primary infection, or secondary infection using International Classification of Diseases, 10th Edition codes. National Early Warning Score was significantly better at discriminating in-hospital mortality, irrespective of infection status (no infection, National Early Warning Score 0.831 [0.825–0.838] vs quick Sequential [Sepsis-Related] Organ Failure Assessment 0.688 [0.680–0.695]; primary infection, National Early Warning Score 0.805 [0.799–0.812] vs quick Sequential [Sepsis-Related] Organ Failure Assessment 0.677 [0.670–0.685]). Similarly, National Early Warning Score performed significantly better in all patient groups (all admissions, emergency medicine admissions, and emergency surgery admissions) for all outcomes studied. Overall, quick Sequential (Sepsis-Related) Organ Failure Assessment performed no better, and often worse, in admissions with infection than without.

Conclusions: The National Early Warning Score outperforms the quick Sequential (Sepsis-Related) Organ Failure Assessment score, irrespective of infection status. These findings suggest that quick Sequential (Sepsis-Related) Organ Failure Assessment should be reevaluated as the system of choice for identifying non-ICU patients with suspected infection who are at greater risk of poor outcome.
Publication status:
Published
Peer review status:
Peer reviewed

Actions


Access Document


Publisher copy:
10.1097/CCM.0000000000003359

Authors


More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Division:
Medical Sciences Division
Department:
Clinical Neurosciences
Oxford college:
St Hugh's College
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0002-5448-6013


Publisher:
Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins
Journal:
Critical Care Medicine More from this journal
Volume:
46
Issue:
12
Pages:
1923–1933
Publication date:
2018-12-01
Acceptance date:
2018-07-08
DOI:
EISSN:
1530-0293
ISSN:
0090-3493


Keywords:
Pubs id:
pubs:919539
UUID:
uuid:1a03eee8-fc12-4149-952a-99e57595379b
Local pid:
pubs:919539
Source identifiers:
919539
Deposit date:
2018-11-21

Terms of use



Views and Downloads






If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record

TO TOP