Barriers and facilitators to implementation of musculoskeletal injury mitigation programmes for military service members around the world: a scoping review

Bullock, GS; Dartt, CE; Ricker, EA; Fallowfield, JL; Arden, N; Clifton, D; Danelson, K; Fraser, JJ; Gomez, C; Greenlee, TA; Gregory, A; Gribbin, T; Losciale, J; Molloy, JM; Nicholson, KF; Polich, J-G; Räisänen, A; Shah, K; Smuda, M; Teyhen, DS; Allard, RJ; Collins, GS; de la Motte, SJ; Rhon, DI

Women's Health Collection

Journal article : Review

Barriers and facilitators to implementation of musculoskeletal injury mitigation programmes for military service members around the world: a scoping review

Abstract:: Introduction Musculoskeletal injury (MSK-I) mitigation and prevention programmes (MSK-IMPPs) have been developed and implemented across militaries worldwide. Although programme efficacy is often reported, development and implementation details are often overlooked, limiting their scalability, sustainability and effectiveness. This scoping review aimed to identify the following in military populations: (1) barriers and facilitators to implementing and scaling MSK-IMPPs; (2) gaps in MSK-IMPP research and (3) future research priorities.

Methods A scoping review assessed literature from inception to April 2022 that included studies on MSK-IMPP implementation and/or effectiveness in military populations. Barriers and facilitators to implementing these programmes were identified.

Results From 132 articles, most were primary research studies (90; 68.2%); the remainder were review papers (42; 31.8%). Among primary studies, 3 (3.3%) investigated only women, 62 (69%) only men and 25 (27.8%) both. Barriers included limited resources, lack of stakeholder engagement, competing military priorities and equipment-related factors. Facilitators included strong stakeholder engagement, targeted programme design, involvement/proximity of MSK-I experts, providing MSK-I mitigation education, low burden on resources and emphasising end-user acceptability. Research gaps included variability in reported MSK-I outcomes and no consensus on relevant surveillance metrics and definitions.

Conclusion Despite a robust body of literature, there is a dearth of information about programme implementation; specifically, barriers or facilitators to success. Additionally, variability in outcomes and lack of consensus on MSK-I definitions may affect the development, implementation evaluation and comparison of MSK-IMPPs. There is a need for international consensus on definitions and optimal data reporting elements when conducting injury risk mitigation research in the military.

Publication status:: Published

Peer review status:: Peer reviewed

Actions

Email

Email this record

Send the bibliographic details of this record to your email address.

Your Email
Please enter the email address that the record information will be sent to.

-
Your message (optional)
Please add any additional information to be included within the email.
Share
Cite

Cite this record

APA Style

Bullock, G. S., Dartt, C. E., Ricker, E. A., Fallowfield, J. L., Arden, N., Clifton, D., Danelson, K., Fraser, J. J., Gomez, C., Greenlee, T. A., Gregory, A., Gribbin, T., Losciale, J., Molloy, J. M., Nicholson, K. F., Polich, J.-G., Räisänen, A., Shah, K., Smuda, M., … Rhon, D. I. (2023). Barriers and facilitators to implementation of musculoskeletal injury mitigation programmes for military service members around the world: a scoping review. Injury Prevention, 29(6), 461–473.

MLA Style

Bullock, GS, et al. “Barriers and Facilitators to Implementation of Musculoskeletal Injury Mitigation Programmes for Military Service Members around the World: a Scoping Review.” Injury Prevention, vol. 29, no. 6, 2023, pp. 461–73.

Chicago Style

Bullock, GS, CE Dartt, EA Ricker, et al. 2023. “Barriers and Facilitators to Implementation of Musculoskeletal Injury Mitigation Programmes for Military Service Members around the World: a Scoping Review.” Injury Prevention 29 (6): 461–73.
Print