Journal article icon

Journal article

The philosophy and history of the moral ‘ought’: some of Anscombe’s objections

Abstract:
According to G.E.M Anscombe’s paper ‘Modern Moral Philosophy’, modern moral philosophy has introduced a spurious concept of moral obligation, and has therefore made a mistake that the Greeks, and Aristotle in particular, avoided. Anscombe argues that the modern concepts of obligation, duty, and the moral ‘ought’ are the remnants of an earlier, but post-Aristotelian conception of ethics, and that they ought to be abandoned. An examination of Anscombe’s historical and philosophical claims shows that we have no reason to take them seriously. In particular, they rest on a misinterpretation of Scholastic views on ‘ought’ and obligation.
Publication status:
Published
Peer review status:
Peer reviewed

Actions


Access Document


Files:
Publisher copy:
10.1007/s10677-023-10398-w

Authors


More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Division:
HUMS
Department:
Philosophy Faculty
Oxford college:
Keble College
Role:
Author


Publisher:
Springer
Journal:
Ethical Theory and Moral Practice More from this journal
Publication date:
2023-06-23
Acceptance date:
2023-05-24
DOI:
EISSN:
1572-8447
ISSN:
1386-2820


Language:
English
Keywords:
Pubs id:
1490259
Local pid:
pubs:1490259
Deposit date:
2023-08-23

Terms of use



Views and Downloads






If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record

TO TOP