Journal article
Racial profiling and cumulative injustice
- Abstract:
-
Many people believe that racial profiling is wrong. A 2004 Gallup poll of public attitudes on racial profiling found that most Americans regard it as unjustified for each context about which respondents were surveyed. For example, 67% expressed the opinion that police may never treat race as a predictor of crime when deciding whether to stop motorists on roads or highways.
What exactly is it that makes racial profiling of this kind wrong? I believe that philosophers working in applied ethics and in legal and political philosophy have yet to work out a fully satisfactory answer to this question.
- Publication status:
- Published
- Peer review status:
- Peer reviewed
Actions
Access Document
- Files:
-
-
(Preview, Accepted manuscript, pdf, 386.2KB, Terms of use)
-
- Publisher copy:
- 10.1111/phpr.12451
Authors
- Publisher:
- Wiley
- Journal:
- Philosophy and Phenomenological Research More from this journal
- Volume:
- 98
- Issue:
- 2
- Pages:
- 452-477
- Publication date:
- 2017-10-06
- Acceptance date:
- 2017-05-15
- DOI:
- EISSN:
-
1933-1592
- ISSN:
-
0031-8205
- Pubs id:
-
pubs:713711
- UUID:
-
uuid:17fb1dc0-c1f0-40ec-9b36-fdf550b40608
- Local pid:
-
pubs:713711
- Source identifiers:
-
713711
- Deposit date:
-
2017-08-14
- ARK identifier:
Terms of use
- Copyright holder:
- Philosophy and Phenomenological Research
- Copyright date:
- 2017
- Notes:
- Copyright © 2017 Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, LLC. This is the accepted manuscript version of the article. The final version is available online from Wiley at: https://doi.org/10.1111/phpr.12451
If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record