Journal article icon

Journal article

Unblackboxing How Sociotemporalities Inform AI Accountability: The Case of Targeted Advertising

Abstract:
In recent years, numerous accountability interventions have been introduced to address the harms and inequalities associated with Artificial Intelligence (AI) systems. Early efforts concentrated on transparency and explainability, often operationalized as technical fixes intended to “open the black box” and render algorithmic processes more intelligible. However, sociological research has revealed the limitations of these interventions, particularly their narrow focus on the technical and operational dimensions of AI. In response, sociologists have broadened the scope of “unblackboxing” to include the sociomaterialities of AI, or the social, political, and environmental relations that both shape and are shaped by AI technologies and their infrastructures. This article extends this agenda by focusing on sociotemporalities: the narratives and structures of time that shape both AI systems and the interventions meant to improve their accountability. We re-analyze interviews from a retrospective study of transparency in targeted advertising, a domain long associated with concerns about privacy, discrimination and opaque practices. Drawing on the sociology of time, and especially the sociology of the future, we examine the sociotemporalities that actively shaped the development of targeted advertising technologies at the time and influenced key informants’ thinking about approaches to improve accountability. Our analysis suggests that sociotemporalities exerted a structuring influence on how “appropriate” accountability interventions were imagined and enacted, ultimately shaping the emergent present of targeted advertising. We discuss the application of such an approach in the context of emerging AI technologies and AI accountability interventions. We conclude by arguing that expanding unblackboxing to include sociotemporal as well as sociomaterial dimensions can help open new pathways for designing and implementing more practical, effective, and context-specific AI accountability interventions.
Publication status:
Published
Peer review status:
Peer reviewed

Actions

Access Document

Publisher copy:
10.1177/08944393251365275

Authors

More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0003-4629-9557
More by this author
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0001-7369-3002
More by this author
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0009-0003-8879-5441
More by this author
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0003-0524-121X
More by this author
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0002-4004-7546


More from this funder
Funder identifier:
https://doi.org/10.13039/501100000269
More from this funder
Funder identifier:
https://doi.org/10.13039/501100000266


Publisher:
SAGE Publications
Journal:
Social Science Computer Review More from this journal
Volume:
44
Issue:
1
Pages:
131-149
Publication date:
2025-08-04
Acceptance date:
2025-07-21
DOI:
EISSN:
1552-8286
ISSN:
0894-4393


Language:
English
Keywords:
Pubs id:
2277119
UUID:
uuid_1658c1f5-11d7-4483-849e-08d8ad6d8be9
Local pid:
pubs:2277119
Source identifiers:
3642136
Deposit date:
2026-01-08
ARK identifier:
This ORA record was generated from metadata provided by an external service. It has not been edited by the ORA Team.

Terms of use


Views and Downloads






If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record

TO TOP