Journal article
Patient-reported outcomes from a phase 3 study of baricitinib versus placebo or adalimumab in rheumatoid arthritis: secondary analyses from the RA-BEAM study
- Abstract:
- Background: To assess the effect of baricitinib on patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and an inadequate response to methotrexate (MTX). Methods: In this double-blind Phase 3 study, patients were randomized 3:3:2 to placebo (N=488), baricitinib 4 mg once daily (N=487), or adalimumab 40-mg biweekly (N=330) with background MTX. PROs included the SF-36, EuroQol 5-D (EQ-5D) index scores and visual analog scale (VAS), Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT-F), Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI), Patient’s Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PtGA), patient’s assessment of pain, and Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire-Rheumatoid Arthritis (WPAI-RA), and measures collected in electronic patient daily diaries: duration and severity of morning joint stiffness (MJS), Worst Tiredness and Worst Joint Pain. The primary study endpoint was at Week 12. Treatment comparisons were assessed with logistic regression for categorical measures or analysis of covariance for continuous variables. Results: Compared to placebo and adalimumab, baricitinib showed statistically significant improvements (p≤0.05) in HAQ-DI, PtGA, pain, FACIT-F, SF-36 physical component score, EQ-5D index scores, and WPAI-RA daily activity at Week 12. Improvements were maintained for measures assessed to Week 52. Statistically significant improvement in patient diary measures (MJS duration and severity), Worst Tiredness and Worst Joint Pain were observed for baricitinib versus placebo and adalimumab at Week 12 (p≤0.05). Conclusions: Baricitinib provided significantly greater improvement in most PROs compared to placebo and adalimumab, including physical function, MJS, pain, fatigue and quality of life. Improvement was maintained to the end of the study (Week 52).
- Publication status:
- Published
- Peer review status:
- Peer reviewed
Actions
Access Document
- Files:
-
-
(Preview, Version of record, pdf, 1.6MB, Terms of use)
-
- Publisher copy:
- 10.1136/annrheumdis-2017-211259
Authors
- Publisher:
- BMJ Publishing Group
- Journal:
- Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases More from this journal
- Volume:
- 76
- Issue:
- 11
- Pages:
- 1853-1861
- Publication date:
- 2017-08-10
- Acceptance date:
- 2017-06-24
- DOI:
- EISSN:
-
1468-2060
- ISSN:
-
0003-4967
- Keywords:
- Pubs id:
-
pubs:702542
- UUID:
-
uuid:16507d82-fcc3-45bd-9477-2f3d959958ca
- Local pid:
-
pubs:702542
- Source identifiers:
-
702542
- Deposit date:
-
2017-07-04
- ARK identifier:
Terms of use
- Copyright holder:
- Keystone et al
- Copyright date:
- 2017
- Notes:
-
Copyright © 2017 the Authors.
This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record