Journal article icon

Journal article

Philoponus, Stephanus and the De Anima

Abstract:
The Greek commentary on Aristotle’s De Anima is assigned by Michael Hayduck to Philoponus, except that he assigns Book 3 to Stephanus. The true continuation of Books 1 and 2 is now known to be a Latin text which claims to be a translation from Philoponus. Peter Lautner, however, contends that both the full commentary and the stray Book 3 are by Philoponus. Pantelis Golitsis argues that Philoponus composed the stray Book 3 while the full commentary is by his tutor Ammonius. Here it will be argued that: (a) Lautner is probably right to deny the stray Book 3 to Stephanus; (b) the criteria employed by Golitsis suggest that Philoponus had a hand in both the Greek and the Latin Book 3; (c) Philoponus is therefore likely to be the author of both the full commentary, as editor of Ammonius, and the stray Book 3 in his own right.
Publication status:
Published
Peer review status:
Peer reviewed

Actions


Access Document


Files:
Publisher copy:
10.1163/18725473-bja10036

Authors


More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Division:
HUMS
Department:
Theology Faculty
Oxford college:
Christ Church
Role:
Author


Publisher:
Brill Academic Publishers
Journal:
International Journal of the Platonic Tradition More from this journal
Volume:
18
Issue:
1
Pages:
106–119
Publication date:
2023-05-10
Acceptance date:
2023-10-22
DOI:
EISSN:
1872-5473
ISSN:
1872-5082


Language:
English
Keywords:
Pubs id:
1553606
Local pid:
pubs:1553606
Deposit date:
2023-10-29

Terms of use



Views and Downloads






If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record

TO TOP