Journal article
Philoponus, Stephanus and the De Anima
- Abstract:
- The Greek commentary on Aristotle’s De Anima is assigned by Michael Hayduck to Philoponus, except that he assigns Book 3 to Stephanus. The true continuation of Books 1 and 2 is now known to be a Latin text which claims to be a translation from Philoponus. Peter Lautner, however, contends that both the full commentary and the stray Book 3 are by Philoponus. Pantelis Golitsis argues that Philoponus composed the stray Book 3 while the full commentary is by his tutor Ammonius. Here it will be argued that: (a) Lautner is probably right to deny the stray Book 3 to Stephanus; (b) the criteria employed by Golitsis suggest that Philoponus had a hand in both the Greek and the Latin Book 3; (c) Philoponus is therefore likely to be the author of both the full commentary, as editor of Ammonius, and the stray Book 3 in his own right.
- Publication status:
- Published
- Peer review status:
- Peer reviewed
Actions
Access Document
- Files:
-
-
(Preview, Version of record, pdf, 363.6KB, Terms of use)
-
- Publisher copy:
- 10.1163/18725473-bja10036
Authors
- Publisher:
- Brill Academic Publishers
- Journal:
- International Journal of the Platonic Tradition More from this journal
- Volume:
- 18
- Issue:
- 1
- Pages:
- 106–119
- Publication date:
- 2023-05-10
- Acceptance date:
- 2023-10-22
- DOI:
- EISSN:
-
1872-5473
- ISSN:
-
1872-5082
- Language:
-
English
- Keywords:
- Pubs id:
-
1553606
- Local pid:
-
pubs:1553606
- Deposit date:
-
2023-10-29
Terms of use
- Copyright holder:
- Mark Edwards
- Copyright date:
- 2024
- Rights statement:
- © Mark Edwards, 2023 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC BY 4.0 license.
- Licence:
- CC Attribution (CC BY)
If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record