Journal article
Oxford NOTECHS II : a modified theatre team non-technical skills scoring system
- Abstract:
-
Background: We previously developed and validated the Oxford NOTECHS rating system for evaluating the non-technical skills of an entire operating theatre team. Experience with the scale identified the need for greater discrimination between levels of performance within the normal range. We report here the development of a modified scale (Oxford NOTECHS II) to facilitate this. The new measure uses an eight-point instead of a four point scale to measure each dimension of non-technical skills, and begins with a default rating of 6 for each element. We evaluated this new scale in 297 operations at five NHS sites in four surgical specialities. Measures of theatre process reliability (glitch count) and compliance with the WHO surgical safety checklist were scored contemporaneously, and relationships with NOTECHS II scores explored.
Results: Mean team Oxford NOTECHS II scores was 73.39 (range 37-92). The means for surgical, anaesthetic and nursing sub-teams were 24.61 (IQR 23, 27); 24.22 (IQR 23, 26) and 24.55 (IQR 23, 26). Oxford NOTECHS II showed good inter-rater reliability between human factors and clinical observers in each of the four domains. Teams with high WHO compliance had higher mean Oxford NOTECHS II scores (74.5) than those with low compliance (71.1) (p = 0.010). We observed only a weak correlation between Oxford NOTECHS II scores and glitch count; r = -0.26 (95% CI -0.36 to -0.15). Oxford NOTECHS II scores did not vary significantly between 5 different hospital sites, but a significant difference was seen between specialities (p = 0.001).
Conclusions: Oxford NOTECHS II provides good discrimination between teams while retaining reliability and correlation with other measures of teamwork performance, and is not confounded by technical performance. It is therefore suitable for combined use with a technical performance scale to provide a global description of operating theatre team performance.
- Publication status:
- Published
- Peer review status:
- Peer reviewed
Actions
Access Document
- Files:
-
-
(Preview, Version of record, pdf, 491.1KB, Terms of use)
-
- Publisher copy:
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0090320
Authors
- Publisher:
- Public Library of Science
- Journal:
- PloS One More from this journal
- Volume:
- 9
- Issue:
- 3
- Article number:
- e90320
- Publication date:
- 2014-01-01
- DOI:
- EISSN:
-
1932-6203
- ISSN:
-
1932-6203
- Language:
-
English
- Keywords:
- Pubs id:
-
pubs:451053
- UUID:
-
uuid:1380acc4-930f-4f75-9d90-c597a500df39
- Local pid:
-
pubs:451053
- Source identifiers:
-
451053
- Deposit date:
-
2014-05-13
Terms of use
- Copyright holder:
- Robertson et al
- Copyright date:
- 2014
- Notes:
-
Copyright © 2014 Robertson et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits
unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record