Updated recommendations for the Cochrane rapid review methods guidance for rapid reviews of effectiveness

Journal article

This article provides updated guidance on methods for conducting rapid reviews of effectiveness, targeted at Cochrane and other stakeholders interested in the methodology of rapid reviews. The guidance, developed by the Cochrane Rapid Reviews Methods Group, builds upon previous interim guidance, and incorporates changes based on an evaluation of its application, a scope of the literature on rapid review methodology, and input from a diverse group of experts in rapid review methods. The guidance consists of 24 specific recommendations supporting the conduct of rapid reviews, applicable both within and outside Cochrane. It underscores the importance of considering the appropriateness of undertaking rapid reviews and advocates for a tailored, iterative approach to each review. Key defining features of rapid reviews, such as restricted methods, how the dimension of timelines factors into rapid reviews, and the involvement of knowledge users (eg, patient and public partners, healthcare providers, policy makers), are outlined. The paper presents a definition of a Cochrane rapid review and additional considerations for rapid reviews of effectiveness to enhance the efficiency of the review process. In conclusion, the Cochrane Rapid Review Methods Group’s updated guidance, complemented by examples, seeks to guide methodological decisions in the design and conduct of rapid reviews, facilitating timely decision making in healthcare.

Authors: Garritty, C; Hamel, C; Trivella, M; Gartlehner, G; Nussbaumer-Streit, B

• Publication status: Published
• Peer review status: Peer reviewed
• Publisher: BMJ Publishing Group
• Journal: British Medical Journal
• Volume: 384
• Pages: e076335-e076335
• Publication date: 2024-02-06
• Acceptance date: 2023-01-02
• DOI: 10.1136/bmj-2023-076335
• EISSN: 0959-8138
• ISSN: 1759-2151
• Language: English
• Keywords: MEDLINE; Process (computing); Interim; Engineering; Health care; Management science; Political science; Cochrane collaboration; Scope (computer science); Timeline; Medicine; Computer science; Systematic review; Risk analysis (engineering); Process management