Involuntary contraceptive sterilisation of women in South Africa and the criminal law

Journal article

The Sterilisation Act 44 of 1998 prohibits sterilisations without informed consent. Despite its enactment, people are being involuntarily sterilised in South Africa and women are reportedly disproportionately affected by this practice. An involuntary sterilisation violates a number of human rights and is recognised as a form of gender-based violence. On this basis, the article emphasises the role of the state to investigate and prosecute instances of involuntary sterilisations. It identifies s 9, read together with ss 2 and 4 of the Sterilisation Act 44 of 1998 and the common-law crime of assault as relevant crimes being perpetrated when a woman is involuntarily sterilised and considers when and how each crime is applicable. The article also recognises the complexity of consent-acquiring practices in the context of reproductive health care and considers criminal liability of different health care providers in relation to refusal to consent, coercion and signed consent forms. These issues need increased consideration because, to date, no health care provider has been held criminally liable for treatment without consent and there is no reported case law demonstrating how to apply criminal-law principles to this area of concern.

Authors: Pickles, C

• Publication status: Published
• Peer review status: Peer reviewed
• Publisher: Juta and Company (Pty) Ltd
• Journal: South African Journal of Criminal Justice
• Volume: 29
• Issue: 2
• Pages: 89 –115
• Publication date: 2016-12-01
• Acceptance date: 2016-06-06