Journal article
We ran one regression
- Abstract:
- The controversy over the selection of ‘growth regressions’ was precipitated by some remarkably numerous ‘estimation’ strategies, including two million regressions by Sala-i-Martin [American Economic Review (1997b) Vol. 87, pp. 178–183]. Only one regression is really needed, namely the general unrestricted model, appropriately reduced to a parsimonious encompassing, congruent representation. We corroborate the findings of Hoover and Perez [Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics (2004) Vol. 66], who also adopt an automatic general-to-simple approach, despite the complications of data imputation. Such an outcome was also achieved in just one run of PcGets, within a few minutes of receiving the data set in Fernández, Ley and Steel [Journal of Applied Econometrics (2001) Vol. 16, pp. 563–576] from Professor Ley.
- Publication status:
- Published
- Peer review status:
- Peer reviewed
Actions
Access Document
- Publisher copy:
- 10.1111/j.1468-0084.2004.102_1.x
Authors
- Publisher:
- Blackwell Publishing
- Journal:
- Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics More from this journal
- Volume:
- 66
- Issue:
- 5
- Pages:
- 799-810
- Publication date:
- 2004-12-01
- DOI:
- EISSN:
-
1468-0084
- ISSN:
-
0305-9049
- Language:
-
English
- Subjects:
- UUID:
-
uuid:11a5c956-56d4-4e45-8f3a-ed540d014684
- Local pid:
-
ora:1992
- Deposit date:
-
2008-05-20
- ARK identifier:
Terms of use
- Copyright holder:
- Blackwell Publishing Ltd
- Copyright date:
- 2004
- Notes:
- The full-text of this article is not available in ORA at this time. Citation: Hendry, D. F. & Krolzig, H-M. (2004). 'We ran one regression', Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 66(5), 799-810. [The definitive version is available at www.blackwell-synergy.com].
If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record