Journal article
Indirect comparisons of treatments based on systematic reviews of randomised controlled trials.
- Abstract:
-
BACKGROUND: Randomised controlled trials are the most effective way to differentiate between the effects of competing interventions. However, head-to-head studies are unlikely to have been conducted for all competing interventions. AIM: Evaluation of different methodologies used to indirectly compare interventions based on meta analyses of randomised controlled trials. METHODS: Systematic review of Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Cochrane Methodology Register, EMBASE and MEDLINE for ...
Expand abstract
- Publication status:
- Published
Actions
Authors
Bibliographic Details
- Journal:
- International journal of clinical practice
- Volume:
- 63
- Issue:
- 6
- Pages:
- 841-854
- Publication date:
- 2009-06-01
- DOI:
- EISSN:
-
1742-1241
- ISSN:
-
1368-5031
- Source identifiers:
-
79577
Item Description
- Language:
- English
- Keywords:
- Pubs id:
-
pubs:79577
- UUID:
-
uuid:1192a32e-5141-4e6e-80bc-1260d8210294
- Local pid:
- pubs:79577
- Deposit date:
- 2012-12-19
Terms of use
- Copyright date:
- 2009
If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record