Journal article icon

Journal article

Indirect comparisons of treatments based on systematic reviews of randomised controlled trials.

Abstract:

BACKGROUND: Randomised controlled trials are the most effective way to differentiate between the effects of competing interventions. However, head-to-head studies are unlikely to have been conducted for all competing interventions. AIM: Evaluation of different methodologies used to indirectly compare interventions based on meta analyses of randomised controlled trials. METHODS: Systematic review of Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Cochrane Methodology Register, EMBASE and MEDLINE for ...

Expand abstract
Publication status:
Published

Actions


Access Document


Authors


More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Department:
Oxford, MSD, Population Health
Role:
Author
Journal:
International journal of clinical practice
Volume:
63
Issue:
6
Pages:
841-854
Publication date:
2009-06-05
DOI:
EISSN:
1742-1241
ISSN:
1368-5031
URN:
uuid:1192a32e-5141-4e6e-80bc-1260d8210294
Source identifiers:
79577
Local pid:
pubs:79577

Terms of use


Metrics



If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record

TO TOP