Conference item
Restricted preference domains in social choice: two perspectives
- Abstract:
- Preference aggregation is a challenging task: Arrow’s famous impossibility theorem [1] tells us that there is no perfect voting rule. One of the best-known ways to circumvent this difficulty is to assume that voters’ preferences satisfy a structural constraint, such as, e.g., being single-peaked. Indeed, under this assumption many impossibility results in social choice disappear. Restricted preference domains also play an important role in computational social choice: for instance, there are voting rules that are NP-hard to compute in general, but admit efficient winner determination algorithms when voters’ preferences belong to a restricted domain. However, restricted domains that have nice social choice-theoretic properties are not necessarily attractive from an algorithmic perspective, and vice versa. In this note, we will discuss some domain restrictions that have proved to be useful from a computational perspective, and compare the use of restricted domains in computational and classic social choice theory.
- Publication status:
- Published
- Peer review status:
- Peer reviewed
Actions
Access Document
- Files:
-
-
(Preview, Accepted manuscript, pdf, 148.9KB, Terms of use)
-
- Publisher copy:
- 10.1007/978-3-319-99660-8_2
Authors
- Publisher:
- Springer International Publishing
- Host title:
- SAGT 2018: Algorithmic Game Theory
- Journal:
- Restricted preference domains in social choice: two perspectives More from this journal
- Volume:
- 11059
- Pages:
- 12-18
- Series:
- Lecture Notes in Computer Science
- Publication date:
- 2018-08-27
- Acceptance date:
- 2018-06-19
- DOI:
- ISSN:
-
0302-9743
- ISBN:
- 9783319996592
- Pubs id:
-
pubs:921074
- UUID:
-
uuid:0ff6f130-5051-43b4-8fff-b64a907b1024
- Local pid:
-
pubs:921074
- Source identifiers:
-
921074
- Deposit date:
-
2018-12-10
- ARK identifier:
Terms of use
- Copyright holder:
- Springer Nature Switzerland AG
- Copyright date:
- 2018
- Notes:
- Copyright © 2018 Springer Nature Switzerland AG. This is the accepted manuscript version of the article. The final version is available online from Springer at: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99660-8_2
If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record