Journal article icon

Journal article

Comparable recurrence risk for MRI ‐detected Gleason Grade Group (GG) 2 and systematic biopsy‐detected GG1 prostate cancer

Abstract:
Objective: To determine the likelihood of definitive treatment and risk of post‐treatment recurrence for patients with Gleason Grade Group (GG) 2 cancer diagnosed using targeted biopsies relative to men with GG1 cancer diagnosed using systematic biopsies. Materials and Methods: We performed a retrospective study using a large tertiary centre registry (the HUS Acamedic data lake) to retrieve data on prostate cancer (PCa) diagnosis, treatment, and cancer recurrence. We included patients with either GG1 PCa detected by systematic biopsies (n = 3317) or GG2 PCa detected with targeted biopsies (n = 554) between 1993 and 2019. We assessed the risk of curative treatment and recurrence after treatment. Kaplan–Meier curves were used to estimate treatment‐ and recurrence‐free survival, and Cox proportional hazards regression was used to evaluate the risk of post‐treatment recurrence. Results: Patients with systematic biopsy‐detected GG1 cancer had a significantly longer median time to treatment (31 months) than those with targeted biopsy‐detected GG2 cancer (4 months; P < 0.0001). Risk of recurrence after curative treatment was similar in the two groups, with the upper bound of the 95% confidence interval (CI) excluding any significant difference (hazard ratio 1.04, 95% CI 0.75–1.43; P = 0.83). Conclusion: Men diagnosed with GG2 PCa based on MRI‐targeted biopsy had a similar risk of recurrence after treatment compared to men with GG1 disease diagnosed using systematic biopsy, although they were more likely to undergo curative treatment. These findings suggest that at least a portion of the apparent increase in GG2 diagnoses in the MRI era may reflect reclassification rather than more aggressive disease. Improved risk stratification is needed to identify which men with MRI‐era GG2 cancer may be suitable for active surveillance.
Publication status:
Published
Peer review status:
Peer reviewed

Actions

Access Document

Publisher copy:
10.1111/bju.70109

Authors

More by this author
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0003-4181-9891
More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0002-4850-4086
More by this author
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0001-5715-5933


More from this funder
Funder identifier:
https://ror.org/00ckakm23
More from this funder
Funder identifier:
https://ror.org/05k73zm37
More from this funder
Funder identifier:
https://ror.org/03vxy9y38
More from this funder
Funder identifier:
https://ror.org/05pgg4z49


Publisher:
Wiley
Journal:
BJU International More from this journal
Publication date:
2025-12-14
DOI:
EISSN:
1464-410X
ISSN:
1464-4096


Language:
English
Keywords:
Pubs id:
2360023
UUID:
uuid_0effa2e4-1a87-43d2-8dd2-c4d00a9f0874
Local pid:
pubs:2360023
Source identifiers:
3564630
Deposit date:
2025-12-15
ARK identifier:
This ORA record was generated from metadata provided by an external service. It has not been edited by the ORA Team.

Terms of use


Views and Downloads






If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record

TO TOP