Public interest damages

Journal article

This article argues that punitive, nominal, contemptuous, vindicatory, and disgorgement damages (commonly referred to as non-compensatory damages) can be collectively analysed as public interest damages because all these awards are justified by violations of public interests in addition to violations of the claimant’s rights. To the extent they are awarded in the public interest, noncompensatory damages feature a distinctively public element in private law. In contrast with compensatory damages, public interest damages are justified by ‘non-correlative wrongdoing’, ie infringements of interests which are valuable to the community rather than to the claimant. This helps us to understand how public interest damages differ from traditional damages awards and why public interest damages should be treated as an exceptional remedy. In support of these claims, the article offers an original analytic framework of reasons that justify damages awards.

Authors: Janeček, V

• Publication status: Published
• Peer review status: Peer reviewed
• Publisher: Cambridge University Press
• Journal: Legal Studies
• Volume: 40
• Issue: 4
• Pages: 589 - 608
• Publication date: 2020-07-21
• Acceptance date: 2020-01-17
• DOI: 10.1017/lst.2020.2
• EISSN: 1748-121X
• ISSN: 0261-3875
• Language: English
• Keywords: FFR