Journal article icon

Journal article

Commentary: On action guidance and good practice in early intervention for psychosis: a response to Bortolotti and Jefferson (2018)

Abstract:
In this response to Bortolotti and Jefferson (2018), we discuss the action‐guidance problem of moral attributes and the risk of superiority illusion in early intervention for psychosis. First, we suggest that guidance documents are not devoid of behavioural recommendations and goals for service provision, though these are not linked to the ethical dimensions of good practice embedded in the documents. Second, we acknowledge the risk of superiority illusion; we suggest that this risk may be reduced if the ethical and clinical goals of early intervention are presented as interrelated and measurable.
Publication status:
Published
Peer review status:
Peer reviewed

Actions

  • Cite

  • Print

Access Document

Files:
Publisher copy:
10.1111/camh.12292

Authors

More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Division:
Medical Sciences Division
Department:
Psychiatry
Role:
Author
More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Division:
MSD
Department:
Psychiatry
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0003-4497-3587

More from this funder
Funding agency for:
Singh, I
Grant:
Investigator Award: #104825/Z/14/Z
More from this funder
Funding agency for:
Corsico, P
Grant:
doctoral scholarship

Publisher:
Wiley
Journal:
Child and Adolescent Mental Health More from this journal
Volume:
23
Issue:
3
Pages:
196-197
Publication date:
2018-08-17
Acceptance date:
2018-06-27
DOI:
EISSN:
1475-3588
ISSN:
1475-357X

Keywords:
Pubs id:
pubs:912124
UUID:
uuid:0e6496e0-0766-413b-bdd4-e37025f2fef0
Local pid:
pubs:912124
Source identifiers:
912124
Deposit date:
2018-10-10
ARK identifier:

Terms of use

Views and Downloads





If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record

TO TOP