Journal article
Montgomery v Lanarkshire Health Board: transforming informed consent
- Abstract:
- The landmark decision of the Supreme Court in Montgomery v Lanarkshire Health Board has confirmed that a patient’s right to self-determination in treatment decisions triumphs over medical paternalism (1). The practical effect is that patients with full mental capacity must be properly advised about their treatment options and the risks associated with each option so that they can make informed decisions when giving or withholding consent to treatment. In other words, the principles of shared decision making must become the norm.
- Publication status:
- Published
- Peer review status:
- Peer reviewed
Actions
Access Document
- Files:
-
-
(Preview, Version of record, pdf, 106.5KB, Terms of use)
-
- Publisher copy:
- 10.1308/rcsbull.2017.36
Authors
- Publisher:
- Royal College of Surgeons of England
- Journal:
- Bulletin of the Royal College of Surgeons of England More from this journal
- Volume:
- 99
- Issue:
- 1
- Pages:
- 36-38
- Publication date:
- 2016-12-01
- Acceptance date:
- 2016-04-01
- DOI:
- ISSN:
-
1478-7075
- Keywords:
- Pubs id:
-
pubs:616092
- UUID:
-
uuid:0de5260e-8626-40dc-ba1f-cab3a8c612d7
- Local pid:
-
pubs:616092
- Source identifiers:
-
616092
- Deposit date:
-
2016-04-15
- ARK identifier:
Terms of use
- Copyright holder:
- Royal College of Surgeons of England
- Copyright date:
- 2016
- Notes:
- © 2016 The Royal College of Surgeons of England. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
- Licence:
- CC Attribution (CC BY)
If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record