Journal article icon

Journal article

Impact of structured medication reviews on prescribing in English Primary Care

Abstract:
BACKGROUND: Structured medication reviews were introduced in 2020 to address polypharmacy in patients most at risk of medicines-related harm. AIM: To evaluate the impact of SMRs on prescribing in primary care. DESIGN AND SETTING: Retrospective observational cohort study of electronic health records from patients aged ≥65 years, prescribed one or more medications and fulfilling the specific eligibility criteria for a SMR, registered at practices contributing data to the Oxford Clinical Informatics Digital Hub (ORCHID), between 1 st April 2020 and 30 th September 2022. METHODS: The association between SMRs and prescription changes was examined by matching individuals who received an SMR to individuals who did not receive an SMR, according to age, sex and primary care practice using cumulative density sampling. Analyses were undertaken using adjusted logistic regression. RESULTS: Of 635,698 eligible patients, 82,285 (12.94%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 12.86%-13.02%) received at least one SMR during the study observation period. In those prescribed potentially inappropriate drug combinations prior to an SMR, between 12.5% and 40.0% were corrected up to three months later. In matched analyses, SMRs were most strongly associated with an increase in new prescriptions of ACE inhibitors (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.56, 95%CI 1.35-1.81), statins (aOR 1.78, 95%CI 1.57-2.02), and antidepressants (aOR 1.45 95%CI 1.28-1.63). SMRs were also associated with stopping these drug classes in those previously prescribed treatment. CONCLUSIONS: SMRs were associated with starting new medications and stopping existing prescriptions compared to usual care. Further work is needed to understand if these changes improved patient outcome.
Publication status:
Published
Peer review status:
Peer reviewed

Actions

Access Document

Files:
Publisher copy:
10.3399/bjgp.2025.0617

Authors

More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Role:
Author
More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0003-0626-7809
More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Role:
Author
More by this author
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0002-7526-3038
More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0001-8844-7496


Publisher:
Royal College of General Practitioners
Journal:
British Journal of General Practice More from this journal
Pages:
BJGP.2025.0617-BJGP.2025.0617
Publication date:
2026-04-16
DOI:
EISSN:
1478-5242
ISSN:
0960-1643


Language:
English
Keywords:
Pubs id:
2407657
Local pid:
pubs:2407657
Source identifiers:
W7154589240
Deposit date:
2026-05-11
ARK identifier:
This ORA record was generated from metadata provided by an external service. It has not been edited by the ORA Team.

Terms of use


Views and Downloads






If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record

TO TOP