Book section icon

Book section

Randomized trials and observational studies: the current philosophical controversy

Abstract:

The supposed superiority of randomized over non-randomized studies is used to justify claims about therapeutic effectiveness of medical interventions and also inclusion criteria for many systematic reviews of therapeutic interventions. However, the view that randomized trials provide better evidence has been challenged by philosophers of science. In addition, empirical evidence for average differences between randomized trials and observational studies (which we would expect if one method wer...

Expand abstract
Publication status:
Published
Peer review status:
Peer reviewed

Actions


Access Document


Authors


More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Division:
MSD
Department:
Primary Care Health Sciences
Oxford college:
Kellogg College
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0003-0280-7206
More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Division:
MSD
Department:
Primary Care Health Sciences
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0001-9730-2133

Contributors

Role:
Editor
Role:
Editor
Publisher:
Springer, Dordrecht Publisher's website
Host title:
Handbook of the Philosophy of Medicine
Pages:
873-886
Publication date:
2017-01-03
DOI:
ISBN:
9789401786874
Keywords:
Pubs id:
pubs:666578
UUID:
uuid:0c919932-3939-41a6-9b48-ab4b768cf6cc
Local pid:
pubs:666578
Source identifiers:
666578
Deposit date:
2016-12-19

Terms of use


Views and Downloads






If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record

TO TOP