- Abstract:
-
BACKGROUND: Studies that systematically search for and synthesise qualitative research are becoming more evident in health care, and they can make an important contribution to patient care. However, there is still no agreement as to whether, or how we should appraise studies for inclusion. We aimed to explore the intuitive processes that determined the 'quality' of qualitative research for inclusion in qualitative research syntheses. We were particularly interested to explore the way that kno...
Expand abstract - Publication status:
- Published
- Peer review status:
- Peer reviewed
- Version:
- Publisher's version
- Publisher:
- BioMed Central Ltd. Publisher's website
- Journal:
- BMC medical research methodology Journal website
- Volume:
- 13
- Issue:
- 1
- Pages:
- 46
- Publication date:
- 2013
- DOI:
- EISSN:
-
1471-2288
- ISSN:
-
1471-2288
- URN:
-
uuid:0c78a205-c3d6-4ead-acee-83096f06872e
- Source identifiers:
-
401939
- Local pid:
- pubs:401939
- Copyright holder:
- Toye et al.
- Copyright date:
- 2013
- Notes:
- © 2013 Toye et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Journal article
'Trying to pin down jelly' - exploring intuitive processes in quality assessment for meta-ethnography.
Actions
Authors
Funding
NIHR Health Services and Delivery Research (HSandDR) programme
More from this funder
Bibliographic Details
Item Description
Terms of use
Metrics
Altmetrics
Dimensions
If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record