What effect have commissioners’ policies for body mass index had on hip replacement surgery?: an interrupted time series analysis from the National Joint Registry for England

McLaughlin, J; Kipping, R; Owen-Smith, A; McLeod, H; Hawley, S; Wilkinson, JM; Judge, A

Journal article

What effect have commissioners’ policies for body mass index had on hip replacement surgery?: an interrupted time series analysis from the National Joint Registry for England

Abstract:: Background Despite their widespread use, the impact of commissioners’ policies for body mass index (BMI) for access to elective surgery is not clear. Policy use varies by locality, and there are concerns that these policies may worsen health inequalities. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of policies for BMI on access to hip replacement surgery in England. Methods A natural experimental study using interrupted time series and difference-in-differences analysis. We used National Joint Registry data for 480,364 patients who had primary hip replacement surgery in England between January 2009 and December 2019. Clinical commissioning group policies introduced before June 2018 to alter access to hip replacement for patients with overweight or obesity were considered the intervention. The main outcome measures were rate of surgery and patient demographics (BMI, index of multiple deprivation, independently funded surgery) over time. Results Commissioning localities which introduced a policy had higher surgery rates at baseline than those which did not. Rates of surgery fell after policy introduction, whereas rates rose in localities with no policy. ‘Strict’ policies mandating a BMI threshold for access to surgery were associated with the sharpest fall in rates (trend change of − 1.39 operations per 100,000 population aged 40 + per quarter-year, 95% confidence interval − 1.81 to − 0.97, P < 0.001). Localities with BMI policies have higher proportions of independently funded surgery and more affluent patients receiving surgery, indicating increasing health inequalities. Policies enforcing extra waiting time before surgery were associated with worsening mean pre-operative symptom scores and rising obesity. Conclusions Commissioners and policymakers should be aware of the counterproductive effects of BMI policies on patient outcomes and inequalities. We recommend that BMI policies involving extra waiting time or mandatory BMI thresholds are no longer used to reduce access to hip replacement surgery

Publication status:: Published

Peer review status:: Peer reviewed

Actions

Email

Email this record

Send the bibliographic details of this record to your email address.

Your Email
Please enter the email address that the record information will be sent to.

-
Your message (optional)
Please add any additional information to be included within the email.
Share
Cite

Cite this record

APA Style

McLaughlin, J., Kipping, R., Owen-Smith, A., McLeod, H., Hawley, S., Wilkinson, J. M., & Judge, A. (2023). What effect have commissioners’ policies for body mass index had on hip replacement surgery?: an interrupted time series analysis from the National Joint Registry for England. BMC Medicine, 21(1), 202–202.

MLA Style

McLaughlin, J, et al. “What Effect Have Commissioners’ Policies for Body Mass Index Had on Hip Replacement Surgery?: an Interrupted Time Series Analysis from the National Joint Registry for England.” BMC Medicine, vol. 21, no. 1, 2023, pp. 202–02.

Chicago Style

McLaughlin, J, R Kipping, A Owen-Smith, et al. 2023. “What Effect Have Commissioners’ Policies for Body Mass Index Had on Hip Replacement Surgery?: an Interrupted Time Series Analysis from the National Joint Registry for England.” BMC Medicine 21 (1): 202–.
Print