Journal article
Are some feasibility studies more feasible than others? A review of the outcomes of feasibility studies on the ISRCTN registry
- Abstract:
- There were too few studies reported as non-feasible to draw any useful conclusions on whether topic and/or setting had an effect. However, the high feasibility rate (83%) may suggest that non-feasible studies are subject to publication bias or that many feasible studies are redundant and may be adding waste to the research pathway.
- Publication status:
- Published
- Peer review status:
- Peer reviewed
Actions
Access Document
- Files:
-
-
(Preview, Version of record, pdf, 964.9KB, Terms of use)
-
- Publisher copy:
- 10.1186/s40814-021-00931-y
Authors
+ National Institute for Health Research
More from this funder
- Funder identifier:
- 10.13039/501100000272
- Publisher:
- BioMed Central
- Journal:
- Pilot and Feasibility Studies More from this journal
- Volume:
- 7
- Issue:
- 1
- Pages:
- 195-195
- Article number:
- 195
- Publication date:
- 2021-11-08
- DOI:
- EISSN:
-
2055-5784
- ISSN:
-
2055-5784
- Language:
-
English
- Keywords:
- Pubs id:
-
1207777
- Local pid:
-
pubs:1207777
- Source identifiers:
-
W3214317709
- Deposit date:
-
2026-03-26
- ARK identifier:
This ORA record was generated from metadata provided by an external service. It has not been edited by the ORA Team.
Terms of use
- Copyright date:
- 2021
- Licence:
- CC Attribution (CC BY)
If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record