Suppressive chemoprophylaxis invites avoidable risk of serious illness caused by Plasmodium vivax malaria

Journal article

Despite inadequacy in preventing vivax malaria after travel, suppressive chemoprophylaxis has dominated travel medicine strategy since the advent of chloroquine in 1946. The lethal threat of falciparum malaria versus the perceived benign consequence of vivax malaria underpins this strategic posture. Recent evidence demonstrating vivax malaria as often pernicious should prompt reconsideration of that posture. Causal prophylaxis kills early developing forms of plasmodia in the liver, thus preventing attacks of falciparum and vivax malaria during travel and delayed onset vivax malaria following travel. Primaquine is the only available drug for this application, and has good evidence of safety, tolerability and efficacy in non-pregnant, G6PD-normal travelers. The primaquine label, however, carries no such indication. Risk of pernicious vivax malaria from all across the endemic regions of the globe, including much of sub-Saharan Africa, should raise consideration of daily primaquine during travel as the preferred front-line option for chemoprophylaxis against malaria in travelers.

Authors: Baird, J

• Journal: Travel Medicine and Infectious Disease
• Volume: 11
• Issue: 1
• Pages: 60-65
• Publication date: 2013-01-01
• DOI: 10.1016/j.tmaid.2013.01.002
• EISSN: 1873-0442
• ISSN: 1477-8939
• Language: English
• Keywords: Malaria; Plasmodium vivax; Primaquine; Causal prophylaxis