Journal article
With Lexical Integrity
- Abstract:
- Müller and Wechsler (MW) contrast lexical (lexicalist) and phrasal (constructional) approaches and conclude that a lexical approach is to be preferred. They present a careful review of the arguments that have been presented for both positions, and they also introduce several new arguments for the lexicalist position. The target article is commendable in many respects, including its thoroughness. However, their representation of our position on Lexical Integrity and constructions is not accurate (Asudeh, Dalrymple, and Toivonen 2008, 2013),1 and they use too broad a brush in painting their picture of Germanic motion constructions; sections 2 and 3 below deal respectively with these issues.
- Publication status:
- Published
- Peer review status:
- Peer reviewed
Actions
Access Document
- Files:
-
-
(Preview, Version of record, pdf, 229.9KB, Terms of use)
-
- Publisher copy:
- 10.1515/tl-2014-0008
Authors
+ Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
More from this funder
- Funding agency for:
- Asudeh, A
- Publisher:
- De Gruyter
- Journal:
- Theoretical Linguistics More from this journal
- Volume:
- 40
- Issue:
- 1-2
- Pages:
- 175-186
- Publication date:
- 2014-07-01
- DOI:
- EISSN:
-
1613-4060
- ISSN:
-
0301-4428
- Pubs id:
-
pubs:478787
- UUID:
-
uuid:0b5c0ce9-3d9f-4cb4-926d-f33d15fa10f2
- Local pid:
-
pubs:478787
- Source identifiers:
-
478787
- Deposit date:
-
2015-05-06
- ARK identifier:
Terms of use
- Copyright holder:
- Asudeh and Toivonen
- Copyright date:
- 2014
- Notes:
- Citation: Theoretical Linguistics. Volume 40, Issue 1-2, Pages 175–186, DOI: 10.1515/tl-2014-0008, July 2014.
If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record