Journal article
A systematic review and metaanalysis comparing the bias and accuracy of the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease and Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration equations in community-based populations
- Abstract:
-
Background
The majority of patients with chronic kidney disease are diagnosed and monitored in primary care. Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is a key marker of renal function, but direct measurement is invasive; in routine practice, equations are used for estimated GFR (eGFR) from serum creatinine. We systematically assessed bias and accuracy of commonly used eGFR equations in populations relevant to primary care.
Content
MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library were searched for studies comparing measured GFR (mGFR) with eGFR in adult populations comparable to primary care and reporting both the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) and the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) equations based on standardised creatinine measurements. We pooled data on mean bias (difference between eGFR and mGFR) and on mean accuracy (proportion of eGFR within 30% of mGFR) using a random-effects inverse-variance weighted meta-analysis. We included 48 studies of 26,875 patients that reported data on bias and/or accuracy. Meta-analysis of within-study comparisons where both formulae were tested on the same patient cohorts using isotope dilution-mass spectrometry-traceable creatinine showed a lower mean bias in eGFR using CKD-EPI of 2.2 ml/min/1.73m2 (95% CI 1.1 to 3.2; 30 studies; I2=74.4%) and a higher mean accuracy of CKD-EPI of 2.7% (1.6 to 3.8; 47 studies; I2=55.5%). Meta-regression showed that in both equations bias and accuracy favoured the CKD-EPI equation at higher mGFR values.
Summary
Both equations underestimated mGFR but CKD-EPI gave more accurate estimates of GFR.
- Publication status:
- Published
- Peer review status:
- Peer reviewed
Actions
Access Document
- Files:
-
-
(Preview, Version of record, 60.6KB, Terms of use)
-
(Preview, Accepted manuscript, pdf, 748.4KB, Terms of use)
-
- Publisher copy:
- 10.1373/clinchem.2017.276683
Authors
- Funding agency for:
- Hirst, J
- Hobbs, F
- Grant:
- RP-PG-1210-12003
- Publisher:
- American Association for Clinical Chemistry
- Journal:
- Clinical Chemistry More from this journal
- Volume:
- 63
- Issue:
- 4
- Pages:
- 475–485
- Publication date:
- 2018-02-28
- Acceptance date:
- 2017-09-19
- DOI:
- EISSN:
-
1530-8561
- ISSN:
-
0009-9147
- Language:
-
English
- Keywords:
- Pubs id:
-
pubs:729921
- UUID:
-
uuid:0aa9a546-9d1a-4abd-9130-94e304ee260f
- Local pid:
-
pubs:729921
- Source identifiers:
-
729921
- Deposit date:
-
2017-09-21
Terms of use
- Copyright holder:
- American Association for Clinical Chemistry
- Copyright date:
- 2017
- Rights statement:
- © 2017 American Association for Clinical Chemistry.
- Notes:
- This is the accepted manuscript version of the article. The final version is available online from American Association for Clinical Chemistry at: https://doi.org/10.1373/clinchem.2017.276683
If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record