Journal article
Current practice and challenges in screening for visual perception deficits after stroke: a qualitative study
- Abstract:
-
Purpose
We document current clinical practice and needs in screening for visual perception problems after stroke to inform development of new screening tools.
Materials and methods We interviewed 12 occupational therapists and 13 orthoptists. Interviews were thematically analysed using the Value Proposition Canvas, a model which establishes challenges and facilitators in what people want to achieve.
Results Participants’ understanding of visual perception varied and often included sensory and cognitive deficits. Occupational therapists commonly screened for visual field deficits and hemispatial neglect, while other aspects of visual cognition were rarely assessed. A positive screening result triggered an orthoptic referral. Screening generally occurred during functional assessments and/or with in-house developed tools. Challenges to practice were: lack of time, lack of training, environmental and stroke survivor factors (e.g., aphasia), insufficient continuation of care, and test characteristics (e.g., not evidence-based). Facilitators were: quick and practical tools, experienced staff or tools with minimal training requirements, a streamlined care pathway.
Conclusions Screening employs non-standardised assessments and rarely covers higher visual perceptual deficits. We demonstrates the need for an evidence-based visual perception screen, which should ideally be 15 min or less, be portable, and require minimal equipment. The screen should be suitable for bedside testing and aphasia-friendly.
- Publication status:
- Published
- Peer review status:
- Peer reviewed
Actions
Access Document
- Files:
-
-
(Preview, Accepted manuscript, 345.9KB, Terms of use)
-
- Publisher copy:
- 10.1080/09638288.2020.1824245
Authors
- Publisher:
- Taylor and Francis
- Journal:
- Disability and Rehabilitation More from this journal
- Volume:
- 44
- Issue:
- 10
- Pages:
- 2063-2072
- Publication date:
- 2020-10-05
- Acceptance date:
- 2020-09-12
- DOI:
- ISSN:
-
0963-8288
- Language:
-
English
- Pubs id:
-
1133149
- Local pid:
-
pubs:1133149
- Deposit date:
-
2020-09-21
Terms of use
- Copyright holder:
- Informa UK Limited
- Copyright date:
- 2020
- Rights statement:
- © 2020 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group
- Notes:
-
This is the accepted manuscript version of the article. The final version is available from Taylor and Francis at https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2020.1824245
If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record