Journal article
The case for mandatory sequestration
- Abstract:
- The fact that cumulative carbon dioxide emissions are more important than annual emission rates calls for a fresh approach to climate change mitigation. One option would be a mandatory link between carbon sequestration and fossil fuel extraction.
- Publication status:
- Published
- Peer review status:
- Peer reviewed
Actions
Access Document
- Publisher copy:
- 10.1038/ngeo709
Authors
- Publisher:
- Nature Publishing Group
- Journal:
- Nature Geoscience More from this journal
- Volume:
- 2
- Issue:
- 12
- Pages:
- 813 - 814
- Publication date:
- 2009-12-01
- DOI:
- EISSN:
-
1752-0908
- ISSN:
-
1752-0894
- Language:
-
English
- Keywords:
- Subjects:
- UUID:
-
uuid:0a635e99-e99d-4e35-af37-53a6122dd882
- Local pid:
-
ora:4456
- Deposit date:
-
2010-11-17
- ARK identifier:
Terms of use
- Copyright holder:
- Macmillan Publishers Ltd
- Copyright date:
- 2009
- Notes:
- The full-text of this article is not currently available in ORA, but you may be able to access the article via the publisher copy link on this record page. Citation: Allen, M. R. et al. (2009). 'The case for mandatory sequestration', Nature Geoscience 2(12), 813-814. [Available at http://www.nature.com/ngeo/].
If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record