Journal article
Limits of rescission for misrepresentation
- Abstract:
-
Rescission is the primary remedy for misrepresentation. The Court of Appeal has recently emphasised this important point, and has also held that an interim payment can be made where a defendant pleads misrepresentation as a defence and that sum of money would be payable were rescission to be ordered at trial. Yet such a robust approach towards rescission may be undermined by the courts’ continuing reliance upon the controversial doctrine of “contractual estoppel”.
- Publication status:
- Published
- Peer review status:
- Peer reviewed
Actions
Authors
Bibliographic Details
- Publisher:
- Elsevier Publisher's website
- Journal:
- Journal of International Banking and Financial Law Journal website
- Volume:
- 31
- Issue:
- 7
- Pages:
- 387-389
- Publication date:
- 2016-01-01
- Acceptance date:
- 2016-05-25
- ISSN:
-
0269-2694
Item Description
- Pubs id:
-
pubs:627694
- UUID:
-
uuid:09a2d163-e207-47aa-beee-ef3d7139ed4b
- Local pid:
- pubs:627694
- Source identifiers:
-
627694
- Deposit date:
- 2016-06-13
Terms of use
- Copyright holder:
- Reed Elsevier (UK) Ltd
- Copyright date:
- 2016
- Notes:
- Copyright © 2016 Reed Elsevier (UK) Ltd. This is the accepted manuscript version of the article. The final version is available online from LexisWeb at: http://lexisweb.co.uk/guides/sources/journal-of-international-banking-financial-law
Metrics
If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record