Adapt or die: how the pandemic made the shift from EBM to EBM+ more urgent

Journal article

Argumentation in research articles has been analyzed from a variety of perspectives, yet there is no integrative description of how these various accounts of scholarly argumentation interrelate. Since a full analysis of scholarly argumentation must take into account domain-specific elements, this work focuses on biomedical research articles, to examine how scholarly argumentation is layered by combining argument structures relating to research methods, citations, and rhetorical aspects of argumentation

Authors: Greenhalgh, T; Fisman, D; Cane, DJ; Oliver, M; Macintyre, CR

• Publication status: Published
• Peer review status: Peer reviewed
• Publisher: BMJ Publishing Group
• Journal: BMJ Evidence-Based Medicine
• Volume: 27
• Issue: 5
• Pages: 253-260
• Publication date: 2022-07-19
• Acceptance date: 2022-07-05
• DOI: 10.1136/bmjebm-2022-111952
• EISSN: 2515-4478
• ISSN: 2515-446X
• Language: English
• Keywords: Context (archaeology); Yesterday; Quality (philosophy); Epistemology; History; Intervention (counseling); Psychological intervention; Nursing; Management science; Political science; Psychology; Health care; Evidence-based practice; Alternative medicine; Engineering; Engineering ethics; Evidence-based medicine; Checklist; Medicine; MEDLINE; Scientific evidence