Journal article icon

Journal article

Burst or conventional peripheral nerve field stimulation for treatment of neuropathic facial pain

Abstract:
Background Trigeminal Neuropathic Pain (TNP) is a chronic facial pain syndrome caused by a lesion or disease affecting one or more branches of the trigeminal nerve. It may, for example, result from accidental injury to a branch of the trigeminal nerve by trauma or during surgery; it may also be idiopathic. TNP is typically constant, in contrast to most cases of the commoner trigeminal neuralgia. In some cases, pain may be refractory to pharmacological treatment. Peripheral nerve field stimulation is recognized as an effective minimally invasive surgical treatment option for this debilitating condition. To date, stimulation has used conventional tonic waveforms, which generate paraesthesia in the stimulated area. This is the first report of the use of paraesthesia‐free burst pattern stimulation for TNP. Methods Seven patients were treated at the John Radcliffe Hospital for TNP from 2016 to 2018. Mean duration of preoperative symptoms was five years. All patients had exhausted pharmacological measures to limited effect. The initial three patients had tonic stimulation with the subsequent four having burst stimulation. Outcome was assessed using the numeric pain rating scale preoperatively and postoperatively at three and six months and one year. Side‐effects and complications were also assessed as well as reduction in analgesic medication use. Results All patients achieved pain reduction of at least 50% at 6 months (range 50–100%, mean 81%, p = 0.0082). Those in the burst stimulation group were paraesthesia free. One patient developed a postoperative infection for which the system had to be removed and is awaiting reimplantation. There were no other complications in either group. Conclusion Burst stimulation conferred similar pain control to tonic stimulation in our small cohort, and there were similar reductions in pain medication use. An additional benefit of burst stimulation is freedom from paraesthesia. Larger scale studies are needed to further evaluate burst stimulation and compare its efficacy with that of tonic stimulation.
Publication status:
Published
Peer review status:
Peer reviewed

Actions


Access Document


Files:
Publisher copy:
10.1111/ner.12922

Authors


More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Division:
MSD
Department:
Surgical Sciences
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0001-5980-9830
More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Division:
Medical Sciences Division
Department:
Surgical Sciences
Oxford college:
St Antony's College
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0002-7262-7297
More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Division:
Medical Sciences Division
Department:
Surgical Sciences
Role:
Author


Publisher:
Wiley
Journal:
Neuromodulation More from this journal
Volume:
22
Issue:
5
Pages:
645-652
Publication date:
2019-01-10
Acceptance date:
2018-11-06
DOI:
EISSN:
1525-1403
ISSN:
1094-7159
Pmid:
30629320


Language:
English
Keywords:
Pubs id:
pubs:959243
UUID:
uuid:06c31470-1617-4271-93a3-0a720d81085f
Local pid:
pubs:959243
Source identifiers:
959243
Deposit date:
2019-01-21

Terms of use



Views and Downloads






If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record

TO TOP