Licensed to kill…discourse? Agents provocateurs and a purposive right to freedom of expression

Journal article

Undercover police operations have emerged from the shadows and into the spotlight in the United Kingdom as a result of a public inquiry into undercover policing and the enactment of the Covert Human Intelligence Sources (Criminal Conduct) Act. The inquiry has revealed troubling details about the ways intelligence and police services have wielded their powers to infiltrate and undermine political groups and social movements over the course of five decades. The problem is not exclusive to the United Kingdom, but is seen the world over. Yet despite the widescale nature of the problem, the legality of agents provocateurs – undercover officers who infiltrate social and political movements to manipulate their messaging, instigate violent tactics and undermine public perception – has received scant attention in legal scholarship or the jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights. This article capitalises on the current spotlight to suggest that agents provocateurs can and should be conceived of as (potential) violations of the right to freedom of expression under the European Convention on Human Rights. A purposive approach is required to ensure protection for not only the means of expression – the exchange of information and ideas – but also the ends – vibrant democratic discourse and meaningful public debate.

Authors: Pentney, K

• Publication status: Published
• Peer review status: Peer reviewed
• Publisher: SAGE Publications
• Journal: Netherlands Quarterly of Human Rights
• Volume: 39
• Issue: 3
• Pages: 241-257
• Publication date: 2021-08-03
• Acceptance date: 2021-08-03
• DOI: 10.1177/09240519211033429
• EISSN: 2214-7357
• ISSN: 0924-0519
• Language: English
• Keywords: covert operations; ECHR; freedom of expression; positive obligations; counterintelligence; protest; agents provocateurs