Journal article
Fidelity of intervention delivery in psychosocial and behavioral programs (FIPP): A modified Delphi study and final guideline
- Abstract:
- Introduction: Fidelity – ensuring interventions are implemented as intended – is a key focus in implementation science. Despite its benefits in research and practice, data on the fidelity of implementation are often overlooked, measured inconsistently, or underreported. In 2024, we proposed a preliminary guideline for one component of fidelity – the fidelity of delivery in parenting interventions. This study builds upon that work, refining the guideline for psychosocial and behavioral interventions. Methods: Using a modified Delphi technique, we refined the Fidelity of Intervention delivery in Psychosocial and behavioral Programs (FIPP) guideline. The process included survey responses (n = 34), two panel consensus meetings (n = 10), and email feedback (n = 5) resulting in six rounds of iterative revisions to produce the final FIPP. Results: The modified Delphi technique resulted in a final FIPP with 35 items across six categories: intervention, facilitator, fidelity measure, and fidelity assessor characteristics; fidelity assessment method; and fidelity results and discussion. The final FIPP was produced based on engagement and data from the survey participants, consensus meeting panelists, and email panelists. Conclusions: This study advances reporting on fidelity of delivery in psychosocial and behavioral interventions by refining the FIPP guideline through a rigorous, consensus-driven process. The FIPP provides a comprehensive structure to improve the consistency and transparency of fidelity of delivery assessment. By promoting standardized reporting, the FIPP enhances the quality of implementation science, ultimately supporting more effective interventions and better participant outcomes. Researchers and practitioners are encouraged to adopt the FIPP to strengthen intervention fidelity and drive meaningful progress in the field.
- Publication status:
- Published
- Peer review status:
- Peer reviewed
Actions
Access Document
- Files:
-
-
(Preview, Version of record, pdf, 341.9KB, Terms of use)
-
- Publisher copy:
- 10.1017/cts.2025.10219
Authors
- Publisher:
- Cambridge University Press
- Journal:
- Journal of Clinical and Translational Science More from this journal
- Volume:
- 10
- Issue:
- 1
- Pages:
- 1-38
- Article number:
- e12
- Publication date:
- 2025-12-19
- Acceptance date:
- 2025-12-04
- DOI:
- EISSN:
-
2059-8661
- ISSN:
-
2059-8661
- Language:
-
English
- Keywords:
- Pubs id:
-
2355889
- UUID:
-
uuid_065d2ad1-41ec-43e9-a3d2-0e002c9f8521
- Local pid:
-
pubs:2355889
- Source identifiers:
-
3686773
- Deposit date:
-
2026-01-23
- ARK identifier:
This ORA record was generated from metadata provided by an external service. It has not been edited by the ORA Team.
Terms of use
- Copyright date:
- 2025
If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record